安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
The question of how do you defined finished. Someone mentioned this in the Cities Skylines 2 forums answering that question:
To me that means you'd have to beat the game to properly say if it's unfinished or not. You can say oh yea 90% it'll be easy to tell. The issue is being honest and listing all of the issues. Just like as AlienTestosterone said earlier, didn't have issues on their system. Maybe being upfront with the issues as a curator is the better option.
"Elden Ring is a thumbs down at launch. It's seemingly unfinished optimizations are causing some gamers transparent enemies even though they exceed the System Specs. Also the stutters are such a big problem that yours truly spent 10 hours trying to fix the stutters and only 6 hours playing the game. Created a guide in an attempt to help those with stutters, but there's no surefire solution outside of having a more powerful system. It seems the recommended specs aren't high enough to have a stable 60 fps experience with no stutters or issues. Below is a test you can do within your 2 hour return period to determine if you'll experience stutters, if you don't, great, below that lists how to reset your game to experience it as if you played it the first time."
Something like that would be more than helpful. A group of people out there for the consumers. The issue is, if you're aware, most of a games sales come in the first month after release and to do a detailed review like that requires a very early copy.
alan wake 2
i suppose spiderman 3 ???
Remember when Games were made by little small groups of people? and a group of White Dudes in a Garage, small office room, or library? Now everything is Corporate, and now the AA studios are rising, which is the games ive been playing recently now.
I have no new incentive to upgrade my CPU (R5 3600) to pair well with my 6700xt which i recently upgraded from my 1660 due to that card being really slow at 1080p. A small bottle neck is something i can live with for the rest of my life, than spending 70-100 dollars for AAA games these days and finding out theyre Trash and not worth playing.
GTA 6 is either going to flop really hard or its going to get GOTY if does REALLY well, which i doubt it due to me seeing the devs at R* right now and what theyre doing. Plus, Us PC players wont even see GTA 6 by 2030 anyways lol.
yeah, that's a fact of the business: deadlines be deadlines.
it was the same thing 30 years ago in the 90's when I was growing up too. except it was a lot harder to get patches and fixes because internet was still in its infancy.
compared to what it used to be 30 years ago, we gamers really got it good nowadays.
I cannot stress that enough.
sure, things could be a lot better, I'm not arguing that.
I am saying however that things are nowhere near as bad as some of the younger and more entitled gamers pretend they are.