Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
Diskussionsregler och -riktlinjer
Anmäl detta inlägg
So, no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rB2RZuy3zPU
"Democrats Use Sleazy Legal Moves To Keep 3rd Parties Off Ballots,"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCfsjpMxdJQ
"Biden Camp FREAKING OUT Over Third Parties; Dems Deploy AGGRESSIVE Tactics To FIGHT Them"
But its wrong if they're actively trying to keep people off of the ballot.
I asked a question, if it was true. I didn't say I knew the answer
Well JFK switched to independent because the dnc wasn't going to let him or anyone else have a fair shot against biden. So I'm inclined to believe the party of lawfare, will use it again on 3rd party.
As for your question, the potential impacts of third party candidates in an American election have been discussed for months already. There are a lot of people talking about it... people worth listening to, I mean.
For example, whatever harms it might do to Democrats, it will have at least much of an impact on Republicans. Robert Kennedy won't be taking too many Biden votes, but there's plenty of Trump supporters who have plenty of reasons to vote for some other anti-vaxxer nutjob.
If anyone was trying to interfere with your freedom to vote in a fair election... it's not AOC you need to worry about... it's the people doing time for those very crimes.
I disagree with him on so much and he has no chance at all to win, but he's against bombing babies and thats kind of an important issue to some people.
More YouTube? Is that where you learned to argue like this? "If you don't agree with me, you support bombing babies" ?
I'm in a generous mood tonight... let's just say "needs improvement".
Mr.West is the only one that isn't in support of the gaza bombings.
I'm not sure Dr. Cornel West would approve of getting your information from YouTube? I think he's a very impressive person - your country could do a lot worse.
Duhhh!
But every single action they have taken to suppress his competition proves not only is that not remotely true, but it proves he is in fact the most worthless and least popular president in our lifetimes.
None of what they have done would be necessary if he received as many votes as they claim. None of what they have done would be necessary if he was as popular and successful as they claim. No other candidate in the history of the country has received (or needed) the level of coddling and damage control and lack of oversight that this criminal geriatric patient has had just to keep him from toppling over and gaffing into oblivion.
Whether its JFK, Trump, Bernie, a puddle of mud, they have to keep all alternatives out of the contest because that's the only way they can cart his broken body over the finish line.
Democrats stole the 2020 election, and they will try to steal the next. Their desperation to horde votes from other candidates proves it beyond all doubt. They are criminals by their own admission.
Hey your phone is ringing... Canada is calling.
JFK is dead. RFK Jr. is the anti-vaxxer nutjob you are referring to.
Would you be so kind as to let your friends know the difference, thanks.
Why did you edit your post to remove the 'your idiot friends' comment? Afraid of something?