Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Автор обсуждения пометил сообщение как ответ на свой вопрос.
Правила обсуждений
Пожаловаться
DPRK ceased all testing in 2020. Immediately started again in 2021. The information Hobbit posted shows this quite clearly.
It would destroy the usa, who has limited ability to make its own stuff.
The proxy war with russia is suppose to weaken it and make putin be voted out, so russia stays out of the us/china war. But they failed
For reasons I already said the political will behind them and the soldiers.
and not looking at yet another link just being thrown out.
Give context or a an actual shortened answer rather than throwing a youtube link as if that will make your reasoning understood.
It`s not about weaponry, it`s about will to fight.
They would likely destroy each other immeasurably one on one and with all alies involved ie NATO vs the ones you said it would be a massacre world wide and China would lose if you could consider any winner out of that mess.
They've tried to copy everything the US has in it military inventory, but the PRC's military and industry is rife with corruption.
And their military since before the second world war is beyond being second rate. The last official conventional war they fought with the US was Korea. And where they made massive gains initially, they were thrown back by both US air power and artillery.
If a war broke out, then China would need to overwhelm US naval power. Initially they could probably beat or sink at least one CVBG, possibly two if lucky, but US submarine power is second to none. Their ports would be destroyed, their trade would be all but cut off, and any invasion and toe hold they had achieved on Taiwan would be short lived, as both US air power and both Army and Marines would push the out.
Xi Jing Ping knows this, which is why he's been building the PRC Navy and establishing a PLA presence in the South China Sea.
Look at how divided democracies get when smaller wars come around.
A larger war and you can bet politicians will be looking for an exit and deal.
No he understood there was someone worth dealing with, basic respect was given.
No respect for Biden and co as they are bad faith actors and their word means nothing.
A full-scale war between the US and China would not be limited to conventional weapons.
Theorycrafting how a full-scale conventional war could take place would not likely reflect reality.
to quote :
By the end of Trump’s term, the talks had petered out and he had little more to show for his efforts than a drawer full of flattering letters. For all of the talk of their great personal relationship, Kim Jong Un had only advanced his capabilities once again. At a military parade in October, he rolled out his biggest intercontinental ballistic missile yet, immediately dubbed the “monster missile” by analysts. Donald Trump could only add his name to the list of American presidents who had tried and failed to curb North Korea’s nuclear ambitions before him.
World's largest arms manufacturers and their products.
1. Lockheed Martin
2. Raytheon Technologies
3. Boeing
4. Northrop Grumman
5. General Dynamics
All five are US companies.
The United States remains the world's largest arms exporter responsible for 41.7 percent of international arms sales between 2019 and 2023, up from 38.6 percent between 2017 and 2021.
Meaningless, the west has not fought any real war since ww2, it was always over match against some small country being ganged up on by the west.
Ukraine revealed how NATO was giving Ukrainians all the worst advice on how to fight as they were just talking out of their behinds.
The Houthis have revealed even a poor nation can bog down a carrier group with missiles.
China is next level, not goat farmers to roll over, they can replenish the equivalent of our entire cruise missile stock in less than a week.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xmkOt6MB6I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSFubB4kMF8
The proliferation of cheap smart munitions means the wests advantages are mostly gone, expensive giant platforms are just targets, and so you will have to resort to mass man power with heavy losses again, and the west in turning itself into a rental car has no social cohesion to sustain that, only a sucker would die for a Biden war. They don't even fly the American flag, its the rainbow, so let them suffer in the trenches, its "their turn".
Also that military defense channel is an obvious NATO shill op
Analyzing NATO Shills with Semiogogue, Mr. Prudentialist, Raging Mandrill, and Marcus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0II5ylOgl3U
A partial blockade would be in effect, limiting most raw resources for China but some of it's neighbors would trade with them is some hard currency, but enough to keep the war machine operational. Globally every market would crash within 6 months, assuming the war lasted long enough a few years other nations would produce what China and the US was lacking.
Overall shy of a nuclear conflict it would be a draw. If the war was extended over multiple years, it might slightly favor the US due to having more markets to trade in, but I wouldn't expect any boots on the ground, it would be more due to internal conflict.
If the war allowed troops in neighboring nations the result might be different.
Since World War II?
Since World War II, the United States has been involved in numerous conflicts and military operations around the world.
1. The Korean War (1950-1953): While the Korean War ended in a stalemate, there were several significant battles where U.S. forces achieved tactical victories, such as the Battle of Inchon and the Chosin Reservoir.
2. The Gulf War (1990-1991): Also known as Operation Desert Storm, this conflict saw a coalition led by the United States decisively defeat Iraqi forces and liberate Kuwait.
3. The Invasion of Afghanistan (2001): Following the September 11 attacks, U.S. forces, along with coalition partners, quickly overthrew the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.
4. The Battle of Fallujah (2004): This was a major operation in the Iraq War where U.S. forces, along with Iraqi troops, fought to regain control of the city of Fallujah from insurgent forces.
5. The Battle of Raqqa (2017): In the campaign against ISIS, U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces, with support from coalition airpower, successfully recaptured the city of Raqqa, the de facto capital of the Islamic State.
https://youtu.be/69YvS3ALths?si=3-7graJIL482degL
Ignoring the political and national will point I made.
I do think it would be harder for the Chinese to occupy the USA than the USA to occupy China.
The amount of weapons civilians carry in the USA is something impressive.
The various gangs making money on drugs are not going to like having that business being tampered with either.