Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Kevin Trenberth, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, 2009: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."
There's also Glaciergate where IPCC got caught misleading people on claims the Himalayan glacier would be melted be 2035.
Anyone remember the polar bear claims? They told us they were going extinct? Well, they never had data that didn't show polar bear populations actually on the rise. From 5,000-10,000 in the 60's to up to 25,000 today.
Obama claimed the claimte was warming faster than anybody anticipated. But data showed no significant warming between 1998 and 2012. Did we suddenly stop burning "fossil" fuels between that period? OF course not.
UN reported in 2012 that glaciers in many areas of the world may be increasing.
They also claimed more hurricanes, and they'd be intenser, the fact is, we've seen the fewest, and the weakest hurricane seasons since the 1970's.
Journal of Geophysical search finds no statistically significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise over the past 100 years. Our cities aren't actually going to be consumed by rising oceans.
Many Nobel laureates have called it out, several NASA scientists have called it out, even former climatologists have admitted they've been approached and recruited to be part of much of this research.
__
A good portion of all that above was flat out wrong. But the worst part is, many of that was known to be wrong and published anyway. Much of it were intentional lies. Some were just statements made with no basis to support it (like polar bears). And I should believe their latest claims... why?
And I'm still waiting for someone to tell me what ENSO is, and how it effects climate.
The biggest problem with with your argument is the last link you provided. Anyone who knows anything about Wikipedia knows that all you have to do to edit pages there is to donate. Anyone. That includes people who aren't scientists.
Does anyone here know that Al Gore runs a solar panel company? How many other of the climate nutters do you think have money in those businesses or run them as well?
The 2 biggest reasons climate change is being talked about is money and power (or power and money). Notice it is mainly the Liberals in the U.S. that talk about it while their actual policies slowly destroy the country. They excel at distracting you with their words as opposed to their deeds.
There is one universal truth regarding anything no matter what you believe ... follow the money and at the end you'll find the truth. I hope to God those of you who believe all this aren't poring your money into the cause.
... or maybe I do. I need a good laugh and that'll be the perfect reason to do it.
However, despite this scientific reality, the Glo.balist Cartel seeks to bring a Singlehanded Worldwide Order which works through Digital Fascism, and want to give the RULING POWER to a few ultra rich oligarchs over 8+ billion MODERNIZED SLAVES who need a QR code to access the civilization, by using the current climate cycle as an opportunity to materialize their own nefarious purposes.
O.k. children here we´ve the more nutty case of totally made up mumbo jumbo thrown in the brain mixer. Who are these "Globalist Cartels"? nobody knows. And since not even totalitarian dictatorships like Russia or China can reliably count on their power structure it´s (of course) just the more brain farty section of the internet who believes in all sorts of made up rubbish.
In this dimension CO² is the global thermostat and no matter how ofter those 2008 talking points´re resureceted: they´re made up nonesense. Basic 6th grade physics can prove this.
Money and power of the fossil fuel companies and countries heavily dependent on the revenue generated by exporting oil and gas.
In this dimension reneweables´re miniscule in comparisson.
Global daily oil consumption´s north of 100.000.000 barrel per day. In the ballpark of some billion liters per day !
Give 3 years, a lot more brands will leave the bandwagon of the Glo.balist Elites that "nobody knows", not just Mercedes-Benz.
I come onto this waste disposal thread and see this.
Tell me how is Ireland's work on the research for using renewable energy of near unlimited supply, being made political?
And when i see near unlimited it is because they thought out of the box and come up with a great idea. I won't tell you what it is yet.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/03/poll_45_of_young_voters_unwilling_to_spend_10month_to_fight_climate_change_despite_it_apparently_being_a_top_priority.html
We haven't broken the hottest day in over a 100 years.
temps are rather mild and unspectecular in the biome im risiding which is freakin Southern freakin Germany
freakin :)
Imagine there is like flash hails in the future and streets are littered with bodies and like a snow plow has to clear that mess
woah
Are these folks pushing these regulations knowing that it's going to negatively impact society or are they just mindless passing laws because it feels good and they don't really know any better.