Modern Internet "terms" like "incel" are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ stupid.

[Shodan]

Celibate is voluntary by definition and saying "involuntary celibate" is about as nonsensical as something like "impossible possibility".

Anyway, even if the "word" itself actually wasn't meaningless ♥♥♥♥, its' definition is just as stupid:

Literally anyone who hasn't had sex and wants to could classify as an "incel" just fine and there's no reason why the "term" should necessarily refer to some creepy male morons with moronic views and not like normal 13 years old girls who just couldn't find a partner, for example.

Similarly, you got people on the Internet using the prefixes "cis-" and "trans-" as if they were words on their own. And the best part is that at the same time, they use these 2 prefixes and also argue that there are more than 2 options beside these "cis-" and "trans-" ones, like entire spectrums even. If you learned history at school, then you might be familiar with the terms "cisalpine" and "transalpine", meaning "on this side of the Alps" and "on the other side of the Alps" respectively, so there are obviously just these 2 possibilities and that's why these prefixes are used. When you say "the" other side, then that refers to the one and only specific alternative.

Basically, there's zero logic behind any of this ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ annoying Internet "vocabulary" and people who actually seriously use ♥♥♥♥ like "incel" in an argument tend to be morons. So, if someone is being a creepy piece of ♥♥♥♥ and a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ moron, then just call him that because that actually has some meaning then. When you invent ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like "incel", it eventually loses all meaning (assuming it had any to begin with, which is not the case here) and then it especially means nothing and you just sound like a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ moron.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Publicado originalmente por El Mythical 23 k.s.c.:

Incel was first made as a term by gay people. Later on people that aren't gay but want to pretend they are made it a bad thing cause they hate white men.

It was coined by one gay person.

The rest of that statement is false.

[craigsters]

A lot of hearts went into the post OP

[- 𝔊𝔢𝔟𝔩𝔬𝔱 -]

A lot of things are stated redundantly nowadays; there are too many empty buzzwords that are used so commonly within the modern vocabulary to the point where they have outright degenerated into almost always using them in the context of an insult.

[El Mythical 23 k.s.c.]

Publicado originalmente por SlowMango:

Publicado originalmente por El Mythical 23 k.s.c.:

Incel was first made as a term by gay people. Later on people that aren't gay but want to pretend they are made it a bad thing cause they hate white men.

It was coined by one gay person.

The rest of that statement is false.

Not nearly as false as it is true though tbh.

[76561199653663961]

Wokies ♥♥♥♥ on language and love to corrupt it. There are countless examples of this. They even change meanings intentionally. "diversity", "equality" and "inclusion" all sound like things nobody could possibly disagree with, but all mean something different in practice.

Here is an in-depth guide to help you understand social justice ideology and how they interpret terms differently from others (remove the spaces) :

https ://newdiscourses . com/translations-from-the-wokish/

The internet idiots don't do this, of course, because they are just followers. They are just extremely sloppy with language. They parrot everything they hear, without (fully) understanding what it means and thereby take the meaning out of it. Hollowing out language's communicative potential.

An example of this is "snowflake". It originates from the movie Fight Club and started getting used as an insult towards LGBT or people with main character syndrome. "A special and unique snowflake". After the woke got their hands on it, to them it now means "being sensitive".

[livinggg]

Publicado originalmente por • ꧁ 🂫 ꧂ •:

A lot of things are stated redundantly nowadays

Yep. Like, the term bi-polar...so redundant it really upsets me. All poles are bi-polar. In fact, having two extremes defines polar, so in reality adding the "bi-" to the word polar is evidence the smartest people in the room are all alone.

[xAlphaStarOmegax]

Ehh it doesnt bother me.

[El Mythical 23 k.s.c.]

Publicado originalmente por bisder🎗:

Publicado originalmente por • ꧁ 🂫 ꧂ •:

A lot of things are stated redundantly nowadays

Yep. Like, the term bi-polar...so redundant it really upsets me. All poles are bi-polar. In fact, having two extremes defines polar, so in reality adding the "bi-" to the word polar is evidence the smartest people in the room are all alone.

No it is dumb because it pretends all people aren't both sad and happy. Bi-polar is a normal process of not always being happy.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Publicado originalmente por El Mythical 23 k.s.c.:

Publicado originalmente por bisder🎗:

Yep. Like, the term bi-polar...so redundant it really upsets me. All poles are bi-polar. In fact, having two extremes defines polar, so in reality adding the "bi-" to the word polar is evidence the smartest people in the room are all alone.

No it is dumb because it pretends all people aren't both sad and happy. Bi-polar is a normal process of not always being happy.

Bi-Polar is not a normal process. It isn't just "I get sad sometimes."

[xAlphaStarOmegax]

Publicado originalmente por SlowMango:

Publicado originalmente por El Mythical 23 k.s.c.:

No it is dumb because it pretends all people aren't both sad and happy. Bi-polar is a normal process of not always being happy.

Bi-Polar is not a normal process. It isn't just "I get sad sometimes."

^This. I have bipolar.

[El Mythical 23 k.s.c.]

No bi polar is actual normal historically. Whats more normal is depression and despair tbh

[Boblin the Goblin]

Publicado originalmente por El Mythical 23 k.s.c.:

No bi polar is actual normal historically.

It isn't.

It isn't normal to spend weeks, sometimes months, on a specific mood. It isn't normal to disassociate with yourself to the point of psychosis.

[xAlphaStarOmegax]

Publicado originalmente por El Mythical 23 k.s.c.:

No bi polar is actual normal historically. Whats more normal is depression and despair tbh

There's more to bipolar than mood swings; you can battle paranoia and even delusions. 

[El Mythical 23 k.s.c.]

Publicado originalmente por SlowMango:

Publicado originalmente por El Mythical 23 k.s.c.:

No bi polar is actual normal historically.

It isn't.

It isn't normal to spend weeks, sometimes months, on a specific mood. It isn't normal to disassociate with yourself to the point of psychosis.

How tf do you know the life of a serf or slave. You think you can tell me that most people in the 10k thousand years of history that lived lives of absolute slavery and serfdom were mentally stable?

Get over yourself and your easy life. You have a much better life than the average person 5k years ago. You live twice as long, own more, etc. Stop pretending you have some new mental health issue.

Your biggest decision is the fast food you order.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Publicado originalmente por xAlphaStarOmegax:

Publicado originalmente por El Mythical 23 k.s.c.:

No bi polar is actual normal historically. Whats more normal is depression and despair tbh

There's more to bipolar than mood swings; you can battle paranoia and even delusions.

It's interesting still seeing people think a mental disorder that has to be treated with a medication that shortens your lifespan is just "You get sad sometimes."