The different between religion, philosophy and factology
Religion is to study about god and afterlife.
Philosophy is to study about concept and beliefs.
Factology is to study about fact and real life.

They are the belief, truth and fact in different levels.
< >
Näytetään 1-15 / 20 kommentista
ok,i hear you,wait there is no such word as factology in english
Viimeisin muokkaaja on DoomsDay; 5.4.2024 klo 6.07
DoomsDay lähetti viestin:
ok,i hear you,wait there is no such word as factology in english
Maybe it's the subject of millennium!
Bomb Shot lähetti viestin:
DoomsDay lähetti viestin:
ok,i hear you,wait there is no such word as factology in english
Maybe it's the subject of millennium!
i bet it won't be
Problem with that is what most people consider "fact" is based off energy fluctuations and not really "real" in the sense you think it is.


So "factology" itself becomes the myth. Or you have to redefine what you consider "real" in order to base "facts" from.
when the mind is used to abuse facts into a desired narrative it becomes religion. When philosophy and fact combine you get quantum physics and stuff like that, when religion and philosophy follow the same path they can be indistinguishable from each other.
"Factology" ??? I think most people would call that science. Although much fewer things are actually facts than most people realize.

A theory is not a fact.
Conclusions are not facts.
Causal relations are not facts.

How valid or workable all of these are does not matter. A fact is an atomic piece of measurable information, and implies that it cannot be different than the fact. For example, the mass or temperature of something.

No matter how valid a theory is, it does not exclude other theories about the same from also being true, and therefore it is not a fact and should not be regarded as such.
Viimeisin muokkaaja on 👾; 5.4.2024 klo 7.18
Religion is belief, philosophy is the knowledge of human nature, I’ve never heard of factology; science?
Juliet lähetti viestin:
Religion is belief, philosophy is the knowledge of human nature, I’ve never heard of factology; science?
Factology is about "fact and real life".
Science is about practice and experimentation.
It's probably the blinders on "If I can't hit with a rock it isn't real" kind of mindset.
GunsForBucks lähetti viestin:
Problem with that is what most people consider "fact" is based off energy fluctuations and not really "real" in the sense you think it is.


So "factology" itself becomes the myth. Or you have to redefine what you consider "real" in order to base "facts" from.
If you can touch a physical dog. It is real.
sleeps lähetti viestin:
Bomb Shot lähetti viestin:
Maybe it's the subject of millennium!
i bet it won't be
It's existing as a world changer.
I think what you are trying to call "factology" typically goes by the phrase "critical thinking" and it is certainly something missing from modern educational systems and common parenting.
Bomb Shot lähetti viestin:
GunsForBucks lähetti viestin:
Problem with that is what most people consider "fact" is based off energy fluctuations and not really "real" in the sense you think it is.


So "factology" itself becomes the myth. Or you have to redefine what you consider "real" in order to base "facts" from.
If you can touch a physical dog. It is real.
Well there are plenty of things you can't touch, or tell you are touching. And things beyond your vision as well. In your world they wouldn't be "real".

That isn't very realistic.
GunsForBucks lähetti viestin:
Bomb Shot lähetti viestin:
If you can touch a physical dog. It is real.
Well there are plenty of things you can't touch, or tell you are touching. And things beyond your vision as well. In your world they wouldn't be "real".

That isn't very realistic.
Why this world is physical. It's not the spiritual world.
we making a whole new baseless belief with this one 🗣🗣🗣
< >
Näytetään 1-15 / 20 kommentista
Sivua kohden: 1530 50

Lähetetty: 5.4.2024 klo 5.56
Viestejä: 21