Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
the entire idea was pitched as a theory. it did require seeing the movie or at least the authors summary of it. if half of the video is an omage to the original Matrix movie and the 4th wall is broken at times. then the second half of the movie is a remake of the original matrix story. what does that say about he movie?
does that at least explain why many people claim it to be the worst movie they ever seen in their life? does that possibly explain the abnormally low rating for a matrix movie?
the theory comes from the author attempting to read between the lines. there's mention of WB and scenes of execs in WB in the movie. literally in a matrix movie. it sounds like some bad tv show episode.
some interesting points is again mentioned in my original post that you seemed to cut out for some reason. the proof of this is in the video per an interview with the directors.
even if the theory is false. i can't imagine how WB can recover when their intention was to create a movie franchise like star wars or whatever. something they can milk for a long time.
Could have done without Pt. 4. I felt it simply wasn't necessary, i.e. it looked like a money grab to be honest.
Even if Keanu is in it I likely won't watch part 5. I was happy where 3 ended and I'll leave it at that.
Not
Care
4th Matrix was fine. Lot of personal numerical and temporal synchronicities as well.