The 4B Movement: A World Without Men

[Republic of Lamers]

The #MeToo movement served as a catalyst for the emergence of the 4B movement in South Korea, as individuals exposed to #MeToo were led to the radical feminist ideologies propagated by groups advocating for the principles of 4B, rejecting sex, child-rearing, dating, and marriage with men.

Now the movement is spreading worldwide. Middle Eastern women are demanding their husbands hire maids and cooks, because they are wives and not slaves.

Thoughts?

[Mega Ultra Chicken]

Feminists don't know what real gender equality is. They still expect men to pay for the first date just because they can.

[TwisterCat]

ZZZZZ님이 먼저 게시:

TwisterCat님이 먼저 게시:

You can't fight against biology and win.

eh come back once everyone turned into a stacy fem-robot (u will be one too)

I don't think my wallet would like that. Sounds expensive.

[ZZZZZ]

King of Gaming님이 먼저 게시:

Feminists don't know what real gender equality is. They still expect men to pay for the first date just because they can.

u expect them to expect, u bamboozled urself

TwisterCat님이 먼저 게시:

ZZZZZ님이 먼저 게시:

eh come back once everyone turned into a stacy fem-robot (u will be one too)

I don't think my wallet would like that. Sounds expensive.

might be free/manadatory or u could go into debt.. I dont think the powerful will put up with human bodies once artifical exists when it comes to future things like space travel

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

Origin님이 먼저 게시:

I only still even care about this junk because I see so many guys suffer. Some even become gals because they think they have no future as a guy. Or they were told they were toxic and needed to reject everything maculine.

Lotta perfectly fine gay guys, trick into becoming gals.

And no I'n not saying all transition are that. Some people really want to change, but others are tricked.

I've yet to see a femboy who wasn't already a little...bi or feminine in the first place, and resorted to it out of desperation.

In fact...that's a bit of a joke/meme.

Hell, in one community I go to. LOTS of the women there ADORE femboys and gender ambiguity.

[Crusader (Banned13x)]

Leonardo Da Pinchi님이 먼저 게시:

Oof, dude defaulted to alt theory because he knew if he answered the question, he'd get exposed. Lol

Crusader (Banned6x)님이 먼저 게시:

It's not about there always being men around for the women who say they need no men. It's about the women who say they need no men sticking to their word. Cause it seems like women only don't need a man when they have the luxuries provided by men to live with.

I'd love to see a reality show where groups of women who "don't need a man" are left in the wilderness or an island without anything man-made for a couple months. Let's see how they thrive without any men or inventions of men. If they run into trouble, they can always hit the emergency "I need a man" rescue button. Cause there's never been a single case of women surviving on their own without male assistance.

And you couldn't address this entire post because you knew you'd get exposed, but defaulted to "Respond to someone else! I'm stumped! I can't disprove anything you said! PLEASE respond to someone else!" Lol.

Feminists are hypocrites. Even their white knights who they look down on can't defend them from the facts.

[Breathe]

Crusader (Banned6x)님이 먼저 게시:

Feminists are hypocrites. Even their white knights who they look down on can't defend them from the facts.

Are you a woman OR a feminist? No?
Then you have no idea what a woman or feminist thinks about men who defend women.

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

Crusader (Banned6x)님이 먼저 게시:

Leonardo Da Pinchi님이 먼저 게시:

Oof, dude defaulted to alt theory because he knew if he answered the question, he'd get exposed. Lol

Crusader (Banned6x)님이 먼저 게시:

It's not about there always being men around for the women who say they need no men. It's about the women who say they need no men sticking to their word. Cause it seems like women only don't need a man when they have the luxuries provided by men to live with.

I'd love to see a reality show where groups of women who "don't need a man" are left in the wilderness or an island without anything man-made for a couple months. Let's see how they thrive without any men or inventions of men. If they run into trouble, they can always hit the emergency "I need a man" rescue button. Cause there's never been a single case of women surviving on their own without male assistance.

And you couldn't address this entire post because you knew you'd get exposed, but defaulted to "Respond to someone else! I'm stumped! I can't disprove anything you said! PLEASE respond to someone else!" Lol.

Feminists are hypocrites. Even their white knights who they look down on can't defend them from the facts.

He digs further with "white knights" cuz it's all he's got. Anyone wanna bet this guy's threatened to fight someone online before to prove how "alpha" he is?

[Mega Ultra Chicken]

King of Gaming님이 먼저 게시:

Feminists don't know what real gender equality is. They still expect men to pay for the first date just because they can.

Also, I don't know why some feminists still believe in traditional gender roles if they want to get away from traditionalism completely. They like when men initiate relationships and when men pay on first dates.

[Crusader (Banned13x)]

Breathe님이 먼저 게시:

Crusader (Banned6x)님이 먼저 게시:

Feminists are hypocrites. Even their white knights who they look down on can't defend them from the facts.

Are you a woman OR a feminist? No?
Then you have no idea what a woman or feminist thinks about men who defend women.

"Are you a Nazi or a neo-Nazi? No?
Then you have no idea what a Nazi or neo-Nazi thinks about other races besides themselves!"

Lol...

Leonardo Da Pinchi님이 먼저 게시:

He digs further with "white knights" cuz it's all he's got. Anyone wanna bet this guy's threatened to fight someone online before to prove how "alpha" he is?

Over half a dozen posts later, still can't address or disprove my points. But they'll argue in circles and toss insults all day themselves while complaining about insults.

Another waste of time.

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

King of Gaming님이 먼저 게시:

King of Gaming님이 먼저 게시:

Feminists don't know what real gender equality is. They still expect men to pay for the first date just because they can.

Also, I don't know why some feminists still believe in traditional gender roles if they want to get away from traditionalism completely. They like when men initiate relationships and when men pay on first dates.

I don't know why you obsess over it, since you're not dating them?

[Breathe]

Leonardo Da Pinchi님이 먼저 게시:

Yup, relationships are give and take. One sided relationships end up in trust issues, infidelity, or divorce.

I think sometimes it requires an unlearning, especially if what a person was brought up to believe as ideal was toxic or imbalanced. That can take a lot of time and moreso, a lot of honesty that can be painful to navigate.

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

Crusader (Banned6x)님이 먼저 게시:

Breathe님이 먼저 게시:

Are you a woman OR a feminist? No?
Then you have no idea what a woman or feminist thinks about men who defend women.

"Are you a Nazi or a neo-Nazi? No?
Then you have no idea what a Nazi or neo-Nazi thinks about other races besides themselves!"

Lol...

Leonardo Da Pinchi님이 먼저 게시:

He digs further with "white knights" cuz it's all he's got. Anyone wanna bet this guy's threatened to fight someone online before to prove how "alpha" he is?

Over half a dozen posts later, still can't address or disprove my points. But they'll argue in circles and toss insults all day themselves while complaining about insults.

Another waste of time.

Have you thought I'm just doing what you do, and disregarding points not worth actually talking about?

Especially points from a bad-faith user who won't even clarify what he means when asked?

[Mega Ultra Chicken]

Leonardo Da Pinchi님이 먼저 게시:

King of Gaming님이 먼저 게시:

Also, I don't know why some feminists still believe in traditional gender roles if they want to get away from traditionalism completely. They like when men initiate relationships and when men pay on first dates.

I don't know why you obsess over it, since you're not dating them?

Is this gender equality? Is this what feminists fought for?

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

King of Gaming님이 먼저 게시:

Leonardo Da Pinchi님이 먼저 게시:

I don't know why you obsess over it, since you're not dating them?

Is this gender equality? Is this what feminists fought for?

Again, what does it have to do with you if you're not dating them? Wouldn't you be happier moving on?

[Boblin the Goblin]

Crusader (Banned6x)님이 먼저 게시:

Breathe님이 먼저 게시:

Are you a woman OR a feminist? No?
Then you have no idea what a woman or feminist thinks about men who defend women.

"Are you a Nazi or a neo-Nazi? No?
Then you have no idea what a Nazi or neo-Nazi thinks about other races besides themselves!"

Lol...

Leonardo Da Pinchi님이 먼저 게시:

He digs further with "white knights" cuz it's all he's got. Anyone wanna bet this guy's threatened to fight someone online before to prove how "alpha" he is?

Over half a dozen posts later, still can't address or disprove my points. But they'll argue in circles and toss insults all day themselves while complaining about insults.

Another waste of time.

Your claim isn't a thing that can be directly proven.

Are there women survivalists? Yeah. Statistically there literally has to be.

But we all know that if any are brought up, the goal shifts to "Well a man created her gear." because it isn't a genuine claim.

As shown(by you literally wanting middle eastern men to oppress women) it's a control issue.