The 4B Movement: A World Without Men

[Republic of Lamers]

The #MeToo movement served as a catalyst for the emergence of the 4B movement in South Korea, as individuals exposed to #MeToo were led to the radical feminist ideologies propagated by groups advocating for the principles of 4B, rejecting sex, child-rearing, dating, and marriage with men.

Now the movement is spreading worldwide. Middle Eastern women are demanding their husbands hire maids and cooks, because they are wives and not slaves.

Thoughts?

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

Първоначално публикувано от Breathe:

I kind of see it as a positive in that the guys or even women who shouldn't even think of getting into a real relationship will be satiated enough with their AI and won't perpetuate the species.

Except women despise male feminists like yourselves here who are defending them. They only want to date us, traditional men who are masculine. If we wanted to sleep with them, we could.

But we reject feminists and casual hook-ups so they stay unhappy and single while complaining about the leftovers they get and we continue to point out their hypocrisy while laughing.

Oh buddy...you're not traditional, traditional men don't perpetuate toxicity.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

Първоначално публикувано от Breathe:

I kind of see it as a positive in that the guys or even women who shouldn't even think of getting into a real relationship will be satiated enough with their AI and won't perpetuate the species.

Except women despise male feminists like yourselves here who are defending them. They only want to date us, traditional men who are masculine. If we wanted to sleep with them, we could.

But we reject feminists and casual hook-ups so they stay unhappy and single while complaining about the leftovers they get and we continue to point out their hypocrisy while laughing.

Thinking you are above women isn't 'masculine'.

[76561199535614511]

Първоначално публикувано от Breathe:

Първоначално публикувано от Leonardo Da Pinchi:

Advanced robotics is going to be amusing on a social level because a lot of the guys who scream women are going to miss them once robot wives come out...forget that it also means women can get robot husbands. Lol

I kind of see it as a positive in that the guys or even women who shouldn't even think of getting into a real relationship will be satiated enough with their AI and won't perpetuate the species. Meanwhile, real men and women who desire relationships will continue on doing so. I think AI can help lessen the swampy mess in the dating pool that currently exists. Win win.


You know, someone else said it in a different thread but it's that men just don't want to up their game at all. Women have already shown to earn their own money, take care of their homes, their families, etc etc. Meanwhile, men are just scraping by doing the bare minimum, not realizing the bar's been upped over the years. It isn't that most women are looking for wealthy, handsome, "alpha male' mates (whatever that is). It's that they expect men to work just as hard as they do, work together WITH them in a relationship, not having to steer everything in their lives but have an equal partner. Men have such a huge problem with women outearning them, now we know why.

thsts alot of words that almost sound like coping. But besides that, it most definitely is a positive. More people choosing to hook up with robots instead of humans = less humans. Not to sound like a environmental extremists but i see less humans as a overall net positive

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

Първоначално публикувано от SlowMango:

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

Except women despise male feminists like yourselves here who are defending them. They only want to date us, traditional men who are masculine. If we wanted to sleep with them, we could.

But we reject feminists and casual hook-ups so they stay unhappy and single while complaining about the leftovers they get and we continue to point out their hypocrisy while laughing.

Thinking you are above women isn't 'masculine'.

In fact, it screams insecurity.

[Crusader (Banned13x)]

Първоначално публикувано от Leonardo Da Pinchi:

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

See, that's all you guys have. "YoU'rE aN iNcEL! YoU hAvE iSsUeS wItH FeMiNiSm!". No actual arguments. Just insults.

Why didn't you ever address my post?

I never said anything about inceldom, I merely said finding the relationship you want instead of wasting energy being bitter online would make you happier.

Again, in case you've forgotten what SlowMango's question was: Oh, and how would these men be "based enough to put an end to it"?

So you're just a SlowMango alt, or what? If I wanted to respond to someone's inane questions, I would.

I don't bother arguing with people who have proven themselves to be a waste of time. I only respond to people to expose their illogic with valid points that they cannot address, like you.

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

Първоначално публикувано от Breathe:

Ooph, that's a self-own, buddy. You might not want to say too loudly that you don't read.

I've already learned to disregard every unintelligent thing you say here, but go ahead, show me where women have survived all on their own without male assistance or inventions.

Yeah, I didn't think you could. Case closed.

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

Първоначално публикувано от Origin:

Guys, most of the men in human history were insecure. We heard it here first.

Given how hard men in power fought to keep women second class citizens, the trend kinda leans towards that.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Първоначално публикувано от Leonardo Da Pinchi:

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

Except women despise male feminists like yourselves here who are defending them. They only want to date us, traditional men who are masculine. If we wanted to sleep with them, we could.

But we reject feminists and casual hook-ups so they stay unhappy and single while complaining about the leftovers they get and we continue to point out their hypocrisy while laughing.

Oh buddy...you're not traditional, traditional men don't perpetuate toxicity.

I have yet to meet a man who claims to be traditional that is actually traditional.

They all want traditional(subservient) wives while they do absolutely nothing in the relationship outside of their job.

No emotional support. No help with child raising. No shared duties.

Those aren't men, those are children.

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

Първоначално публикувано от Leonardo Da Pinchi:

I never said anything about inceldom, I merely said finding the relationship you want instead of wasting energy being bitter online would make you happier.

Again, in case you've forgotten what SlowMango's question was: Oh, and how would these men be "based enough to put an end to it"?

So you're just a SlowMango alt, or what? If I wanted to respond to someone's inane questions, I would.

I don't bother arguing with people who have proven themselves to be a waste of time. I only respond to people to expose their illogic with valid points that they cannot address, like you.

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

I've already learned to disregard every unintelligent thing you say here, but go ahead, show me where women have survived all on their own without male assistance or inventions.

Yeah, I didn't think you could. Case closed.

Oof, dude defaulted to alt theory because he knew if he answered the question, he'd get exposed. Lol

[Breathe]

Първоначално публикувано от Leonardo Da Pinchi:

Growing up I thought I wanted a "Trad wife" until I actually started dating, and found I'm much more open to different types of people than I had originally thought.

I've had similar experience. I grew up thinking or fantasizing about my future that way but throughout my experiences it became clear to me that what I thought I wanted wasn't healthy. I would never want to be with anyone who doesn't consider me an equal, someone with rigid ideas of what it means to be the man or woman in a relationship. However, as painful as some experiences were, they were necessary for me to have seen that BEFORE I made a life decision like marriage.

[TwisterCat]

You can't fight against biology and win.

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

Първоначално публикувано от SlowMango:

Първоначално публикувано от Leonardo Da Pinchi:

Oh buddy...you're not traditional, traditional men don't perpetuate toxicity.

I have yet to meet a man who claims to be traditional that is actually traditional.

They all want traditional(subservient) wives while they do absolutely nothing in the relationship outside of their job.

No emotional support. No help with child raising. No shared duties.

Those aren't men, those are children.

Most of them haven't aged out of highschool mentality, brainwashed by self depicted "alpha male" personalities who treat them like cash cows.

At least, the ones online who make those claims.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

Първоначално публикувано от Leonardo Da Pinchi:

I never said anything about inceldom, I merely said finding the relationship you want instead of wasting energy being bitter online would make you happier.

Again, in case you've forgotten what SlowMango's question was: Oh, and how would these men be "based enough to put an end to it"?

So you're just a SlowMango alt, or what? If I wanted to respond to someone's inane questions, I would.

I don't bother arguing with people who have proven themselves to be a waste of time. I only respond to people to expose their illogic with valid points that they cannot address, like you.

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

I've already learned to disregard every unintelligent thing you say here, but go ahead, show me where women have survived all on their own without male assistance or inventions.

Yeah, I didn't think you could. Case closed.

So asking you want you mean is an "inane question"?

That actually tells me(and everyone here) you know how women in the middle east are usually treated and are wanting the men to continue to treat them like that.

Which also just shows your desires as well. Not a relationship, a piece of meat you can order around.

[Leonardo Da Pinchi]

Първоначално публикувано от Breathe:

Първоначално публикувано от Leonardo Da Pinchi:

Growing up I thought I wanted a "Trad wife" until I actually started dating, and found I'm much more open to different types of people than I had originally thought.

I've had similar experience. I grew up thinking or fantasizing about my future that way but throughout my experiences it became clear to me that what I thought I wanted wasn't healthy. I would never want to be with anyone who doesn't consider me an equal, someone with rigid ideas of what it means to be the man or woman in a relationship. However, as painful as some experiences were, they were necessary for me to have seen that BEFORE I made a life decision like marriage.

Yup, relationships are give and take. One sided relationships end up in trust issues, infidelity, or divorce.

[ZZZZZ]

Първоначално публикувано от TwisterCat:

You can't fight against biology and win.

eh come back once everyone turned into a stacy fem-robot (u will be one too)

[Breathe]

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

Първоначално публикувано от Crusader (Banned6x):

I've already learned to disregard every unintelligent thing you say here, but go ahead, show me where women have survived all on their own without male assistance or inventions.

Yeah, I didn't think you could. Case closed.

I don't believe in being in relationships with anyone who doesn't work as hard as I do, so why in hell should I do your job for you? You have eyes, you have some fingers to tap keys or flip book pages, you do the work. Heh you're just proving my point for me first-hand, thanks.