Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But they WRITE could of, not could've and they say could OF not could've.
I hear the difference even though I am not a native.
That said though languages do evolve from lazy speech. Ain't isn't an English word only American for example.
I agree with you it is done out of ignorance but ignorance wins when it becomes accepted.
Personally I have seen the mistake a few times and just assume it is voice to text and lazy checking since it isn't a spelling error.
Not something I worry about.
Stop writing "have;" instead have: "of."
Merica!
"Could've" sounds as "could of." So the software that converts speech to text simply writes that.
I'm certain that you know how it should be. But as long as it conveys the message, its all good.