Do You Believe In "Kink-Shaming"?

[BunnieBealla]

do you believe some acts or aesthetics people can be into should be condemned? or do you believe in all freedom of expression as long as it's consensual? uwu

[Hammer Of Evil]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย BunnieBealla:

do you believe some acts or aesthetics people can be into should be condemned? or do you believe in all freedom of expression as long as it's consensual? uwu

depends if thats your kink hahaha.

ok ok jokes aside,

uh, my thing with it is, one should show some consideration and dont be waving your kinks in public like a flag. Its not something you should do in polite company either, unless you're asked or given consent first, then well, its their problem. dont ask if you dont want to know the answer! lol.

i'll absolutely condemn a few interestss which are illegal, but we wont discuss those here lol

[Fajita Jim]

I don't care what you do, behind closed doors or in public, as long as I am free to go about my way without being accosted or impeded.

I would rather have to walk by a BDSM parade that have to put up with some guy in a busted Honda Civic blaring Emenim at 2 ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ AM.

[☮ne✟rue𝓢ax☯n]

Only if it involves children or animals. Other than that kink-shaming sounds kind of prudish. If consenting adults want to get freaky that's their business, I won't judge.

[Chaosolous]

As long as you're not committing a crime, IDC what you do in your bedroom... or in front of a computer.

People are into all kinds of stuff. I don't shame but I don't promise to understand either.

[Corvus XIII]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย BunnieBealla:

do you believe some acts or aesthetics people can be into should be condemned? or do you believe in all freedom of expression as long as it's consensual? uwu

Don't know what that is but if you show me some of your kinks I'll tell you if you need to be ashamed or not.

[SHAZBOT]

my rule in life is dont antagonize god.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBISF7aY0Jk

[LEON help]

I got a certain friend who goes beyond kink shaming when it comes to people with a certain type of kink. . . It's why I don't keep trying to dox this one guy who was grooming a child despite having a network to do so. If she found out where the guy lives she'd turn him into a war crime.

[Candyy ♡]

I do not see any reason to shame them 🤷‍♀️

[SHAZBOT]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย SharkOfTheDead:

I got a certain friend who goes beyond kink shaming when it comes to people with a certain type of kink. . . It's why I don't keep trying to dox this one guy who was grooming a child despite having a network to do so. If she found out where the guy lives she'd turn him into a war crime.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93KA65F2Vbo

[Uncle Sam]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย BunnieBealla:

do you believe some acts or aesthetics people can be into should be condemned? or do you believe in all freedom of expression as long as it's consensual? uwu

If it isn't a crime or a extreme paraphilia like the examples listed by aqua star, I say go ahead everyone can do their own stuff in bed, as long it's between consenting adults. Other than that everyone has different boundaries and limits.

[Mina]

Absolutely, I would unalive guro enthusiasts if everything fell in place for me. A few are disgusting and symbolize an unhealthy people, plenty are fine but plenty aren’t

[b]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Tifa Lockhart:

No, it's fine if it's consensual

If the kink shaming is consensual?

[Cee]

most stuff no

[Coffinmaw]

Freedom of expression goes both ways. You're free to express your kinks if you want, just as i'm free to ridicule you for being into that.

[Uncle Sam]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Mina:

Absolutely, I would unalive guro enthusiasts if everything fell in place for me. A few are disgusting and symbolize an unhealthy people, plenty are fine but plenty aren’t

Also another example of extreme paraphilia, essentially Not Safe For Life type of stuff