Do You Believe In "Kink-Shaming"?

[BunnieBealla]

do you believe some acts or aesthetics people can be into should be condemned? or do you believe in all freedom of expression as long as it's consensual? uwu

[BunnieBealla]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Q-T_3.14.exe:

"Kink-Shaming" sounds like a kink itself.

yes but at this point everything is a kink uwu

[Q-T_3.14.exe]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย BunnieBealla:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Q-T_3.14.exe:

"Kink-Shaming" sounds like a kink itself.

yes but at this point everything is a kink uwu

Always has been uwu

[Voroff]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Q-T_3.14.exe:

"Kink-Shaming" sounds like a kink itself.

Yes, yes, YES, hahahahahahhaha !!

[the vampire of time and memory]

yeah some mfs need some shaming

[astroskiffle]

Just maintain a respectful distance from me and my kids, and I shall graciously refrain from getting in your business.

[Pierce Dalton]

I don't care what people do at bed, no.

[Voroff]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Pierce Dalton:

I don't care what people do at bed, no.

We do not need to go to the bed topics when talking about kink-shaming the brits. They "exist", and that's providing an endless supply of reasons to shame them.

What's the saying about the englishes, the conquests, the spices, and the (lack of) culinary talent of the brits ? :p There's even a Irish folklorist and poet than said, i quote "if the brits can survive their own food, they can survive anything".

A brit, by sheer existence, has merits for all the of shamings. And that's long before we get to bed, sheets and closed curtains :D

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย aqua star:

Only for the wrong ones like pedophilia or cannibalism.

Think those are classified as crimes, not kinks.

[ZZZZZ]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Rumpelcrutchskin:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย aqua star:

Only for the wrong ones like pedophilia or cannibalism.

Think those are classified as crimes, not kinks.

cannibalism is legal in many if not most places on earth

[Angel]

I just mind my own business.
What others do is no concern of mine

[BunnieBealla]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Rumpelcrutchskin:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย aqua star:

Only for the wrong ones like pedophilia or cannibalism.

Think those are classified as crimes, not kinks.

they are also kinks to some people uwu

[Pixie]

ERP me if have a problem with my ERP fetish <3

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย ZZZZZ:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Rumpelcrutchskin:

Think those are classified as crimes, not kinks.

cannibalism is legal in many if not most places on earth

Maybe in handful of places not much touched by civilization and certainly not in most places.

[gugnihr]

I think that violence and "abuse", even when it is somehow "fake" like in bdsm relationships, should at least not be considered socially acceptable and no it should not be allowed but of course behind the closed doors of their home people should be free to do what they want, as much as I hate BDSM privacy and freedom at least in your home is still the most important thing imho.
I think that this kind of kink, both sadism and masochism, are mental illnesses except the masochists are the only ones who pay the price of it, and it does not matter if they are willing to do so it is still like exploiting the problem of a person to do something which is basically evil.
This kind of behaviour is unacceptable and should always be unacceptable imo. As I said privacy and freedom are the most important priorities so I don't want people to be spied 24 / 7 just to make sure that they don't do this kind of things, no this would be even worse, but generally speaking this kind of things should be condemned and not be perceived as acceptable. If those people cannot be cured at least the safety and dignity of the weaker, most vulnerable side (the masochgists) should be protected.

[ZZZZZ]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Rumpelcrutchskin:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย ZZZZZ:

cannibalism is legal in many if not most places on earth

Maybe in handful of places not much touched by civilization and certainly not in most places.

maybe not officially legal like it is in USA, germany or UK but probably still legal in theory in most places, there are simply no recent court rules to define the legal status at most places but its likely that they wont rule against it