Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
yep
Eventually, people will recognize these innately, I think. And probably, it'll really start to annoy us
There are only so many patterns you can get from copying samples of human writings. Especially when you consider the narrow knowledge of those developing the training datasets.
In fact, the youngest generations that are growing up with AI right now may have an intuitive advantage that lets them become AI 'super-detectors' in the future. Maybe that's our defense against deep fakes. Eight-year-olds. 🤣
-Sir Reginald investigates the disappearance of Lady Penelope’s prized biscuit tin.
-Clues lead them to suspects muttering about “custard creams” and “shortbread diplomacy.”
-Lord Archibald McSnickerdoodle, a biscuit collector, is revealed as the culprit.
-Justice prevails, and Sir Reginald earns a lifetime supply of custard creams.
Thank you.