Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
Because there's really no such thing as nothing, even before the Big Bang. It's just that the ways we can measure it are different after the Big Bang than before. 4 forces vs 1.
No, the Universe won't make more sense. Not much, anyway. A little.
It might help you get used to it not making sense, though.
Or you could read five hundred heavy philosophy books. Whereupon, the universe still won't make more sense. Not much, anyway. And your head will hurt.
No Man's Sky is more fun than five hundred heavy philosophy books.
I mean as much as I like NMS...
And the graphics sucked.
There is a book called Sophie's World everyone should read who is thinking about getting into reading the great works of philosophy, or even anyone who is currently an avid reader of the philosophers from antiquity through the modern age.
https://www.amazon.com/Sophies-World-History-Philosophy-Classics/dp/0374530718
Read it to the end. It explains quite well how philosophy is a losing game, and it's all chaos at the end of it all. Not just the book. Philosophy itself. Nonsensical, pointless chaos is its logical endpoint.
I don't read philosophy to agree or disagree, but rather for a wider understanding of viewpoints.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=406-n0jybjo