Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
Actually more like since our first Microsoft and/or Google account. But yer right, whatever.
Don't edit my posts when responding to me. Don't attempt to initiate some manner of debate with me over a post made in bloody February. I don't take kindly to either or.
He botched the Bay of Pigs and threw the CIA under the bus to appease the international community, which in turn saw the CIA and the Cosa Nostra putting him down. Oswald was a patsy, he wasn't shot from the grassy knoll. He was shot from the front.
I'd add, at the time, the CIA was infamous for botched or messy assassinations. We will probably never know the full story. But rogue or unsanctioned CIA makes the most sense to me. He did botch the Bay of Pigs, no doubt. But he was presented with an impossible choice that was already in motion. The CIA boinked the Bay of Pigs through idiocy, hubris, and absolute lack of planning. JFK was just left holding the ball. In retrospect, he should have killed the operation, but he knew that would lose him the center-right, so he made the expedient, not the correct call.
"Oswald acted alone" made zero sense in the Warren Report, and makes even less sense today. You don't have t be a conspiracy theorist to spot a lie. Especially an elaborate, badly told lie.
I mean, I could reupload it. I used tools from facepunch that literally let you shoot from anywhere.