Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Death (any)
You're arguing semantics regarding "best" and "favorite". Nobody cares.
Nobody sounded like Alice in Chains before Facelift and Dirt dropped, but plenty since then have been heavily influenced by them. And AIC broke big on MTV with "Man in the Box" while Pearl Jam and Nirvana were still up and coming. Were you even around at the time?
Not everyone digs Snoop and Dre, so don't get upset when people rate the Beastie Boys higher than them. Beasties were far more creative anyway, as far as I'm concerned. Ever listen to Paul's Boutique?
To be sure, the 1990s was the death of rock. All the bands were in some form playing a eulogy to the form, with the grunge style being the sui generis of the death knell. Alice in Chains released 'Facelift' 1 year before Pearl Jam released their genre defining 'Ten' album. Pearl Jam's sound was identifiable as a 'genre' while AiC was sounds like muddled rock caught somewhere between metal and grunge. Sure, their songs aired on MTV but that doesn't make Facelift or Dirt a best album of the 90s. Pearl Jam took off and became a decade defining sound, AiC did not.
The Beastie's were an 80s hip hop group moreso than a 90s one. Dr. Dre and Snoop created a whole new sound with their music that made hip hop/rap the sound of the next couple decades. The Beastie's were in decline during the 90s, while Dre and Snoop were ascendant.
I think you proved my point about people interpreting the word "BEST" in the OP's title as "FAVORITE" when you discuss that people may prefer the Beastie's over Dre or Snoop. That's fine, but it's best to stay level headed about these kinds of discussions and not make the fatal error of claiming that all your favorite music is the "best" music.
*Ironically, no one posted Michael Jackson's Dangerous (1991) as a best album of the 90s even though it is one of the best selling albums of all time. This kind of shows that people are just posting their favorite stuff without paying attention to the prompt.
So why doesn't OP just re-write the topic as "favorite albums of the 90s?" Then people can just post whatever, and this thread won't be haunted by the likes of me: the OT ghost of logic, facts, and accuracy.
Beastie Boys released three critically acclaimed and very successful albums in the 90s. Hardly a decline.
I think you're letting your apparent dislike of Alice in Chains get in the way of things. Whether you like it or not, they were one of the most unique rock bands of their era, found success prior to Pearl Jam, and established a sound that is imitated to this day. They're every bit as "decade-defining" as Pearl Jam, and arguably have a better legacy to boot, considering their influence has a much wider genre range (even Slayer swiped a bit of their sound at one point).
It's also kind of odd to take any one grunge band and call it more identifiable as a genre than another grunge band. If you've noticed, the "big four" of grunge had very dissimilar sounds.
Calling a band "one of the most unique rock bands of their era" is hyperbole.
Grunge is a rock style that emerged from and defined the 1990s.
Claiming that the band didn't evolve past their 80s sound just tells me that you haven't listened to their albums.
Calling them "derivative" is dumb. Derivative of who?
It emerged from the 80s. Ever listen to stuff like Melvins or Mother Love Bone? Even Nirvana dropped a record in the 80s.