Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
nothing's changed in thousands of years.
it's just an insane robot's pet island on petstore earth. not even the first cornish person to make that observation iirc.
I get what she meant in the context, but it sounds so stupid worded that way.
Mandalorian?
I think the issue is that it made them look delusional and highlighted the tween rp fantasy aspects of the series.
which in turn made it look like the propaganda that it was.
No, it's from Fire Emblem Engage, when the protagonist is running from enemies who have the upper hand, and says they can't spend their entire life running away, and another character says t he quote.
I get the point, but it just sounds stupid because running away is what makes a retreat.
wow mandalorian stole from fire emblem after the uk bought fire emblem.
those crazy disnerds. who are they loyal to anyway?
also it's a quote from king arthur when he resisted the french, despite the british central government deciding to simply allow french raiders to do what they want along the coasts.
he favored defense in depth, so if they broke the line along the first 100 paces they'd retreat 300 and attack their bulge.
No, I mean that's what I am pulling it from, I'm not trying to claim that's where it came from. I don't care. I doubt the quote was inspired from King Arthur, or anywhere. It's just coincidence, and stupid.
So if an outlet cuts and splices together video to make it look like someone is saying something they didn't, and the full length footage proves that it was edited, and that context shows they weren't saying what the headlines were claiming, is it not proven to be faked?