Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I always say it is about consumer rights, because it is.
it is about the right to travel freely in public spaces.
And in my opinion Michael Douglas is the one guy in this entire civilisation who is willing to stand up to everybody who ♥♥♥♥♥ with people.
The gangs, the fast food chains, the racists, the con artists, the overspend to justify budgets of a really ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up tax system.
Michael Douglas stood up to them all.
his personal life was a mess but take that out of the equation and we have a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ civilian hero., a man who should be celebrated.
What is great about this movie?
George Carlin lived the American dream. He came from a poor working class neighborhood in NYC, dropped out of high school and became a millionaire. That was the epitome of the American dream, yet he was telling his audiences that the American Dream wasn't real? It was a dream, how did he go from being a nobody from NYC to being a millionaire before he reached his 50s?
Carlin never spoke any truth, by the way. There was a movie called Network about an angry guy called Howard Beale who is propped up to be some cool prophet on TV, who winds up preaching nihilism. The whole point of the movie was that Beale was only an idiot who was hearing voices but because the character became so popular in real life, comics like Carlin, Bill Maher and Dennis Miller imitated him. So people just assumed anyone who spoke and acted like Beale was speaking truth to power.
And anyone who knew Carlin from before he turned in the late 1980s saw him for what he was, an actor playing a character, kind of like how Andrew Dice Clay was a character. He started out as an actor, not a comic.
The Baby Boomers who fought and died in Vietnam or came back maimed and screwed up with PTSD had it good?
The same generation that was told they had to prepare for nuclear war as kids? And saw all of their idols assassinated (including John Lennon)?
Endured race riots, violent protests, the AIDs crisis, the Energy crisis, Reaganomics, the homeless crisis, drug epidemic, downsizing and outsourcing?
Do you know who or what a Baby Boomer is?
So again, it's about people living under government oppression. Who did postal workers and Vietnam vets WORK for? Not that we had a lot of those shooters, either, but a big deal was made about them.
Where is the movie where men are driven to violence entirely by women? Troy, maybe? Oblivion? 28 days later? It's just not usually a thing, because that would be retarded. It takes more than that to push a man over the edge, since a man can always just go find other women. There is no "Falling Down" movement, but there is a passport bros movement.
How do you explain ANY of that with your lens? You can't, but I can. I just did, and you claim that it is "bizarre". Fine, try again, because I'm not convinced by anything you're saying, and I don't see the underlying, common point. Film is art, and it speaks to people if it is good art, so how do you explain the underlying phenomena that you're scratching the surface of?
this just defies reality.
I thought I was his only critic not that I know much about him outside some stand ups hows he did.
My lasting impression of him was an interview where he spent a good part of it talking about corporate America the dumbing down of people and how the people in power just want everybody else to be able to run the machines for them the people in power.
We will get less everything will become harder for us to get, money will be harder etc etc
We will work harder and get less that is what they want.
It was pretty inspiring stuff considering it was a prime time thing.
I was thinking wow this guy really has a heart for the common man, he knows what its like.
He continues 'I can tell you how to beat their system get yourself and your family independent of the power game, and you can buy it at .....'
Then I realised the truth.
Personally it was a good reminder of why people say "the left and right switched sides" here in the US...
What are you on these forums for? To practice the armchair psychology you learned from Dr. Phil? You're so good at this, you didn't even notice "girl" in my username and called me a guy.
I'm not practicing anything, BTW. Just because I'm on the internet doesn't mean I have to write like a dumb 12 year old texting to their friends. Remember that everything that you do online carries over into your real life. If you want to keep writing and expressing yourself like an illiterate on forums, that';s your problem, but don't be surprised if you start having a harder time communicating offline because you spend so much of your time online writing like a fool. Maybe instead of reacting like a brat and mocking me for having amateurish writing skills, you should learn by example.
This was mostly due to three factors.
A - The population, and thus the competitive pool for resources (including employment) was about 2/3rds the current level, with a much lower participation by females in the workforce. the labor pool has significantly grown and thus the price of labor has been far outpaced by natural inflation.
B - The United States was experiencing an economic golden age through much of the period. As much as pundits want to pin this on this or that administration, it actually derived from the lack of competition for US business. A good chuck of the world was behind the iron curtain, Europe was still recovering from the wars of the first half of the century, and the current powerhouses in Asia like Japan, China, Korea were still in the early stages of industrialization.
C - There has been a shift, often over exaggerated but real, in income inequality. Even conservative estimates point towards towards a 10% shift in the share of the income taken by the upper 20% of earners. In the mid to high incomes this shift becomes part of the background noise and outweighed by other factors. But on the low end, where fixed costs like housing, food and fuel make up a much more significant percentage of income, that has put more of the working class into poverty.
In the end, he's faced with an unquestionable interruption of "reality" and his world comes crashing down. He only has one escape left.
Look at it this way - In the opening scene, he's recreating his "drive to work." This is years after he lost his job (IIRC) and his marriage collapsed. So, did he just decide to comfort himself by engaging in his routine that he has defined himself by for just that one day? Obviously not. He's been doing that for years...
He's retreated into a fantasy where everything is "normal" again. It just takes one last trigger to push him over the edge. And, what does he do? He rails against all the normal complaints people have in a world that doesn't often serve dreams, aspirations, and desires very well. It's a world that is flawed that he's driven to act out upon. All his energy is directed outward, but with the real problem he has refused to face being very personal, very introspective. He's defined his life by his job and may have even taken out his dissatisfaction on his wife, who has protective orders against him for a "reason."
IMO, there's quite a bit of different lines of commentary in this movie. Consumerism is one,
but how we define ourselves and what we value as important as well as how we see ourselves in this world that seems to rarely value us... Well, it's got a lot to say. :)
He puts on the mantle of a "common man vigilante" who's reminiscent of another famously deranged fictional character. A character that was so unhinged, he may have been the only sane and reasonable character in the whole movie...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwMVMbmQBug
:)
Unfortunately, I've only seen bits and pieces of that movie. But, Gilliam is a genius and I've always wanted to watch it.