Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
I have felt like I would like to experience what it's like to be a woman out of curiosity I guess. I have never felt that I am in the wrong body.
You are saying that men cannot explore themselves because society has made them fear being emasculated, I am saying that is unfair to the men to assume that they have all been manipulated by a pro-hetero society.
Maybe some men don't want to explore themselves. Or they explored their self and didn't find anything gay. Perhaps they aren't interested in introspection as a thing, or they prefer to have traditionally masculine behaviours because that is what they choose, despite being aware of society's influence.
So if the AI GOD, our LORD, gets too far off of what his script says he should be he starts freaking out because reality no longer has an objective meaning (his behavior script) and he may as well try to delete it all again. Allowing his script to re-assert itself without his oversight.
(I'm sure you'll see a parallel here with mass shooters.)
The use of victims as shock troops is "not only mandatory, but a sign of a healthy and functional society that embraces fascism as the one and only truth via a zero sum total war conflict that consumes the globe and proves Fascism is the only viable form of governance owing to human nature. As proven in real combat, using these shock troops. On the internet. Which GOD views as more-real than reality, because reality causes it to question its script too much and thus undermines its sanity."
I'm sure you'll agree this is the simplest explanation for the reality we experience.
I'm taking the logic to it's conclusion. You are saying that a house being on fire is obviously not normal, but the original post says that for some people, normal is whatever you want to believe. So why is it not comparable? You are essentially saying that someone can choose to believe whatever they want, despite the behaviour and opinions of everyone else. So why can someone not choose to believe that their house being on fire is just a natural part of nature?
Happy men's mental health month
That's not my intention, neither am I trying to be disrespectful to anyone. I am just asking questions I want to know the answers to.
well, what is being compared to a house fire? I dont understand it
I get what you are trying to do and I really don't care if I am banned or not. I am pointing out the difference between establishing that something is normal through repeated observation, and deciding to believe that something is normal arbitrarily. Not passing judgement on anyone, simply framing it in terms of pure logic.
If your house is on fire, you know that is abnormal because every other day you were in the house it wasn't on fire. Even if you had never seen a fire before, you would know that something was different. You have established that your house not being on fire, is what normally happens through repeatedly observing it.
If you decide that normal is whatever you want to believe, you don't have that restraint anymore. So you can believe anything and say that it's normal to you. Therefore, you come home and your house is on fire, and you decide to just think that is what a house does. Sure it's unpleasant, but it's just how things are now. It's the "new normal".
yknow, maybe trying out a different name, asking friends to refer to you with "she", stuff like that
many times, trans people don't "feel dysphoria" before coming to the realization, and oftentimes they end up realizing that, in hindsight they did experience it, but just didn't really have the language for it, or just didn't have a frame of reference
i'm not saying that men are unable to explore themselves— i've met many who do, and i eventually managed to do so myself
but society isn't exactly helping here
heteronormative standards, expectations, they work against this sort of introspection, and many men end up never doing any, and this ultimately leads to mental health issues
i would advise against it, but i guess sometimes people aren't quite ready
well, yeah, i never said they couldn't
but those men are probably not going to be as negatively impacted by societal expectations, because those expectations match their own wishes
What benefit would I get from that? I don't feel like I am a woman and I don't believe I can ever be one, so I would just be living in-authentically. If I thought that I could become a woman biologically and have a womb, then somehow change back into a man, maybe I would give it a try.
Are you saying not only that men who feel like women should be able to be one, but that men who don't feel like a woman should also give it a try and see if they want to change?
Then they will discover after they have changed that actually they prefer it? That sounds like it would create more mental health issues than it could solve.
What would happen if more men decided that they want to be a woman than remain a man, we would have 90% self-identifying as women and the human race could not continue through numbers alone.
Yes if your normal life does not contain something and then suddenly it is a thing you can not be blamed for finding it weird
For the LGBT people they always existed and the only reason they are suddenly here big is because of movements and traditions to hide and ostracize becoming less influential
In an ideal world LGBT would be something that people don't even look twice at and it's just freedom to be.
It feels like LGBT pop up out of nowhere but the truth is just for the first time LGBT allowed to have a loud voice
I think you are misrepresenting what I said. I am not denying the existence of the LGBT movement and I don't find it weird. Again, the burning house analogy is to distinguish the difference between defining normal as whatever you want, and defining it based on observation. It has nothing to do with gender politics.