安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The creator can choke on his own faulty creation for all I care and all he deserves.
That being said, sometimes "stupid" people believe in smart things, and vice versa. The logic that poeple use in debating this issue is more interesting than the debate itself, tbh.
A poster explained it a while ago in Reddit. The root of the problem lies in the Oral Tradition that Arabs had at the time of 7th Century AD. People didn't even know exactly at what age they are in themselves without comparing the years cross-checking with other prime events happened at the time. For example, there wasn't even a written calendar amongst Arabs before the Prophet's Migration with first Muslims from Becca to Medinah.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateReligion/comments/105yqb3/prophet_muhammad_%EF%B7%BA_did_not_marry_aisha_ra_at_the/
As a sidenote, the poster in Reddit doesn't yet know that the city Prophet was born isn't named as Mecca, but it is called as "Becca". Dan Gibson proved that a few years ago, with several proofs that the city the Prophet Muhammed was born was called "Becca", currently known as "Petra". In Qur'an, it is also written as "Becca". In verse 3:96. Though the translations translate it as Mecca, in original ARABIC TEXTS, it is written as "Becca". I can read Arabic letters, by the way. The word "Mecca" is also mentioned once in Qur'an, but it is explained as a ground where a fierce battle took place between Muslim Armies and the Heathens, not where the Kaaba exists. For more information about this, watch below video:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5tth1QVg780
It is a very long subject to write in here.
but if you are willing to take other peoples experiences in near death you start to see that statistically yes it probably exists
Non-existence isn't "scary". You're not there to experience it anyway. Sitting in darkness for all eternity, is that what you think is scary? That's not death. That's an oubliette. But in the end, we don't know. Death is a mystery, one of the few big ones no one gets to sidestep. So, how do you handle existential mysteries like that? Do you turn it into some kind of narrative that suits your thinking? Or do you accept the unknown?
You can keep your taqiya for yourself. ^^
I see who stab who in my country, I don't need to know anything else about your religion and how your own behave. I don't care what is written in your books or not, from my point of view I see only invaders.