Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
SICK IN THE HEAD !
Edit: The wonderful world of censorship.
Topic:
But "un-alive" sounds really bad. Ridiculous at best. Like satire. Actually political talk sounds like satire as well, but this is not a fun word to say. "un-alive" - one could better do the opposite and call the living undead. Given the amount of time spent dead compared to time spent alive it would be the more fitting term. And it´s way more fun.
Whats funny is it doesn't change anything or make the issue better. Soon "unalive" will carry the same dreaded meaning and will be used in normal conversation.
When I was in elementary school "handicapped" was the preferred word to refer to disabled people instead of teh r-word, which was considered highly offensive.
By the time I reached high school, "handicapped" had become an offensive word and people started to use "handicapable" instead.
The word itself isn't what has the power, it's the meaning of the word. You can change the word to anything you want, but if you're using it to refer to a class of people who are less functional than the rest of society, that word will carry a stigma no matter what.
Same with "dead" and "unalive"
It's honestly depressing to see a society that claims to embrace free speech, engage in meaningless acts of self-censorship.
Funny "unalive" brings us closer to the language system used in the book 1984 because they tried to remove all words with a undesirable context in that book, and if anyone wanted to talk about the opposite they would just add "un" to the front of it.
It's not a coincidence that people who support these things also like to make up fake "identities" in their heads and project their ideas onto everything, whether it is actually there or not. They don't live in the real world but a fictional one, consisting entirely of words, ideas and theories. That's why they need validation so much, because all of these things are unreal and will start to fall apart whenever they don't get reaffirmed.