The damage Bud Light Boycott did to Anheuser-Busch and It’s Brutal

[Groogo]

The Bud Light brand has lost a total of 1.4 billion according to a report by CNN. The report goes on to say that the troubles that Anheuser-Busch faced in 2023 are following the brand into 2024.

[aka]

We need to get back to a time where men were men

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27cernpdO3Q

[El Mythical 23 k.s.c.]

Birds님이 먼저 게시:

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

I guess you have never looked into how polling/surveys work. So thats a 1% error of margin. 6k+ and across all 50 states is one of the better surveys samples you'll normally find for anything.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/margin-of-error-calculator/

332 million people, a 95% confidence level, on 6000 people. = 1% margin of error

I can hear you pointedly ignoring me.

those are statistical failures; you should feel ashamed for even pretending to argue for them.

Sorry I was replying to someone else. Also you replied back "and if you keep talking to me for any reason I will make whatever you are doing more difficult."

Is your insane name calling projection or am I missing something?

feel free to make your argument why "those are statistical failures"

[xDDD]

aka님이 먼저 게시:

We need to get back to a time where men were men

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27cernpdO3Q

If only

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6o2OV_VPjIk

[Birds]

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

Birds님이 먼저 게시:

I can hear you pointedly ignoring me.

those are statistical failures; you should feel ashamed for even pretending to argue for them.

Sorry I was replying to someone else. Also you replied back "and if you keep talking to me for any reason I will make whatever you are doing more difficult."

Is your insane name calling projection or am I missing something?

feel free to make your argument why "those are statistical failures"

I don't care, i'm roleplaying all the people who harass me over random ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ when I'm trying to talk to someone on here.

you're missing a reality of abuse that makes what you're doing look like, itself, intentional and calculated for-profit abuse that makes me wish things I can't say here.

I don't have to; it's obvious. the statistic are gathered wrong by idiots. did you gather them yourself? if so you're an idiot, and if not then how do you even know they're valid? you don't. idiot.

[El Mythical 23 k.s.c.]

Birds님이 먼저 게시:

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

Sorry I was replying to someone else. Also you replied back "and if you keep talking to me for any reason I will make whatever you are doing more difficult."

Is your insane name calling projection or am I missing something?

feel free to make your argument why "those are statistical failures"

I don't care, i'm roleplaying all the people who harass me over random ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ when I'm trying to talk to someone on here.

you're missing a reality of abuse that makes what you're doing look like, itself, intentional and calculated for-profit abuse that makes me wish things I can't say here.

I don't have to; it's obvious. the statistic are gathered wrong by idiots. did you gather them yourself? if so you're an idiot, and if not then how do you even know they're valid? you don't. idiot.

Thats for your thoughts.

[Birds]

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

Thats for your thoughts. :conwayheadscratch:

page roll-over; nobody cares about the leverage posts now, or bud light's english ownership.

[Pierce Dalton]

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

Ouch, that backfired badly. 6k people?

I guess you have never looked into how polling/surveys work. So thats a 1% error of margin. 6k+ and across all 50 states is one of the better surveys samples you'll normally find for anything.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/margin-of-error-calculator/

332 million people, a 95% confidence level, on 6000 people. = 1% margin of error

You know that 6k is nothing compared to the American population. That's like asking 10 friends if they like wine and trying to push the narrative that their answers represent the general population.

Besides, I was talking exclusively about trans people.

[Birds]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

I guess you have never looked into how polling/surveys work. So thats a 1% error of margin. 6k+ and across all 50 states is one of the better surveys samples you'll normally find for anything.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/margin-of-error-calculator/

332 million people, a 95% confidence level, on 6000 people. = 1% margin of error

You know that 6k is nothing compared to the American population. That's like asking 10 friends if they like wine and trying to push the narrative that their answers represent the general population.

Besides, I was talking exclusively about trans people.

i dunno it's a reasonable measure of engagement. less than 6,000 people per state have a meaningful impact on governance.

the same logic is true behind engagement-based brigade tactics; the assumption is that the only people insane enough to argue are infact the people who get things done and matter.

meaning making them more insane wil lhelp everyone, right?

[El Mythical 23 k.s.c.]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

I guess you have never looked into how polling/surveys work. So thats a 1% error of margin. 6k+ and across all 50 states is one of the better surveys samples you'll normally find for anything.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/margin-of-error-calculator/

332 million people, a 95% confidence level, on 6000 people. = 1% margin of error

You know that 6k is nothing compared to the American population. That's like asking 10 friends if they like wine and trying to push the narrative that their answers represent the general population.

Besides, I was talking exclusively about trans people.

Well from that report
"In its LGBTQ identity breakdown, the report found 72% of Gen Z adults identified as straight, 15% as bisexual, 5% as gay or lesbian and 8% as something else. "

I'm not sure how many of that 8% identify as trans but here from an older article.

"The number of Gen Zers identifying as transgender is almost double the number of millennials who identify as trans, according to a survey by Gallup....At 1.9 percent, Generation Z—those who were born between 1997 and 2004—has the highest percentage of people who say they identify as trans among all previous three generations."

That 2% reporting is from when Gen Z was reporting at "19.7 percent among Gen Zers"

So probably safe to say between 2-3% Gen Z think they are trans now.

[Talby]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

Talby님이 먼저 게시:

I see it as people pushing back against the corruption of the medical profession (doctors and psychologists) that push medical procedures for a quick buck in the name of "gender dysphoria" far and beyond over actual mental health needs. This is why the trans suicide rate has nearly tripled over the past few years...

Pushing back against something that doesn't exist? That would be a terrible method to make a "quick buck" given that only 1% or so of the world population is interested in such procedures.

And how do you know the reasons they've taken their own lives?

That is what I am saying, serious problems like the rash of mass shootings recently is also a symptom of... "something" at least we can say.

Not to mention this is compounded by tax $$ from the abortion industry... oh my bad surely no corruption is there either

[Pierce Dalton]

Talby님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

Pushing back against something that doesn't exist? That would be a terrible method to make a "quick buck" given that only 1% or so of the world population is interested in such procedures.

And how do you know the reasons they've taken their own lives?

That is what I am saying, serious problems like the rash of mass shootings recently is also a symptom of... "something" at least we can say.

Not to mention this is compounded by tax $$ from the abortion industry... oh my bad surely no corruption is there either

Ffs what does one thing have to do with another?

Ok it's all a big conspiracy orchestrated by the Illumilefty.

[Pierce Dalton]

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

You know that 6k is nothing compared to the American population. That's like asking 10 friends if they like wine and trying to push the narrative that their answers represent the general population.

Besides, I was talking exclusively about trans people.

Well from that report
"In its LGBTQ identity breakdown, the report found 72% of Gen Z adults identified as straight, 15% as bisexual, 5% as gay or lesbian and 8% as something else. "

I'm not sure how many of that 8% identify as trans but here from an older article.

"The number of Gen Zers identifying as transgender is almost double the number of millennials who identify as trans, according to a survey by Gallup....At 1.9 percent, Generation Z—those who were born between 1997 and 2004—has the highest percentage of people who say they identify as trans among all previous three generations."

That 2% reporting is from when Gen Z was reporting at "19.7 percent among Gen Zers"

So probably safe to say between 2-3% Gen Z think they are trans now.

I do not live in America, but let me tell you something:

I live in a city with aprox 100k people. How many transgender people exist here? I don't know but I'm 100% sure that it's less than a thousand (a thousand = 1%). In fact, much less than that.

[El Mythical 23 k.s.c.]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

Well from that report
"In its LGBTQ identity breakdown, the report found 72% of Gen Z adults identified as straight, 15% as bisexual, 5% as gay or lesbian and 8% as something else. "

I'm not sure how many of that 8% identify as trans but here from an older article.

"The number of Gen Zers identifying as transgender is almost double the number of millennials who identify as trans, according to a survey by Gallup....At 1.9 percent, Generation Z—those who were born between 1997 and 2004—has the highest percentage of people who say they identify as trans among all previous three generations."

That 2% reporting is from when Gen Z was reporting at "19.7 percent among Gen Zers"

So probably safe to say between 2-3% Gen Z think they are trans now.

I do not live in America, but let me tell you something:

I live in a city with aprox 100k people. How many transgender people exist here? I don't know but I'm 100% sure that it's less than a thousand (a thousand = 1%). In fact, much less than that.

Thats a feeling. Look you don't have to believe any studies, surveys, or polls.

[Pierce Dalton]

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

I do not live in America, but let me tell you something:

I live in a city with aprox 100k people. How many transgender people exist here? I don't know but I'm 100% sure that it's less than a thousand (a thousand = 1%). In fact, much less than that.

Thats a feeling. Look you don't have to believe any studies, surveys, or polls. I gave you numbers based on Gen Z also...

No, it's not a feeling, it's a fact. But you don't have to believe me either. Now be honest what's the population of your city and how many trans people have you seen there?

[El Mythical 23 k.s.c.]

Pierce Dalton님이 먼저 게시:

El Mythical 23 k.s.c.님이 먼저 게시:

Thats a feeling. Look you don't have to believe any studies, surveys, or polls. I gave you numbers based on Gen Z also...

No, it's not a feeling, it's a fact. But you don't have to believe me either. Now be honest what's the population of your city and how many trans people have you seen there?

You criticize surveys covered by multiple national news outlets, including pro lgbt outlets, but want us to find truth in our guessing about people we have never seen in our cites???