Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
It's so funny how indoctrinated you are it's like you all read off the same script. One would hope that the old saying of with age comes wisdom hold true for you.
Why do you put 'Leftists' in double quotes, as if it's not something that actually exists?
like for example previously trump haters in 2016 have been turned into trump voters in 2024.
So just because you don't agree with me, you proceed to call me names? Who's being the immature one here? There's been no shortage actually of people who exaggerate and overreact about "wokeness". If anything, THEIR responses have indicated an immature and and brainwashed attitude. After all, they aren't reacting based on how THEY actually feel about "wokeness" but what the media tells them about it. If being an adult is thinking for YOURSELF, then they have utterly failed in that regard.
They immediately yelled and act outraged about whatever latest thing the television tells them to. Besides, this post was a criticism of Bill's personal vendetta and crying about "wokeness", not what the average person thinks about it. Considering how the "targets" of his anti-wokeness campaign tend to mostly be Gen Z and college students and kids, it comes off more as an old man yelling at kids to get off his lawn as opposed to being a mature and measured response to change.
I didn't say that being "anti-woke" is evil or somehow exclusively a right wing mentality. It's possible to simply act outraged about something far more irrationally than necessary, and for other people to call you out for it because it comes off as overly dramatic and irrational. I don't base me liking someone on whether they agree with me or not.
I didn't always agree with everything Bill Maher said but I respected him. That doesn't mean one can't call him out on his own hypocrisy and negative behavior when he decides to display it on his own show. It's called having a lack of consistency and respect. And being a comedian doesn't mean you get to insult people or mock them in a negative manner just because you think "it's funny". Especially since Bill's criticism is meant to be a political statement as opposed to a cheap joke. You don't know anything about me, so perhaps you should keep your ad hominom attacks to yourself.
That was a typo. It was supposed to only be quotes before the period. And I used quotes because different people have different ways of defining leftists, so to use it in a more general way, where the quotes indicate that they're possibly defined differently depending on who's reading it.
If I remember correctly (and I probably don't) he said Clinton was a disappointing candidate. It wasn't that he liked Trump. It was just that Clinton didn't offer anything.
The title of your thread is asking if he's become conservative. I would think that his political views are, for the purposes of this discussion, the most important aspect of what we are talking about.
Challenging your beliefs is the best way to know your beliefs.
Fair enough. At the same time, how do you do a show like his without talking about individuals?
I'm not really seeing that. I feel like more hit than miss.
Jon Stewart doesn't do skits. He does monologues, and sets up skits for others. That's about it.
John Oliver rarely does skits. He mostly sits behind a desk, reads jokes written by others, takes all the credit, and smiles smugly into the camera while doing all of it.
Oh, and 'The Daily Show' skits that use the current "correspondents"? Most of them can be skipped. As they are almost always to make fun of Trump voters. A horse that has long died, and it simply isn't funny kicking it anymore.
No. They take the modern progressive view. That they MUST use their platform to promote their personal opinions. Which they do, endlessly. It's never *NOT* about politics with them.
This is how I know you aren't a long-time fan of Maher. Because 'Politically Incorrect' was even more wild than his current show. And he was mostly the same then. Ego included.
Your city wants to put up low-income housing area next to your home? Suddenly you have an opinion about zoning laws.
All anyone need do is look at a political alignment chart. Better yet, one that charts the extremity of views of U.S. elected officials over time.
Spoiler: It shows that the core members of both parties have been moving further and further from the center.
Actually, it is. Like, it literally is.
I've seen him say nice things about Trump, and make fun of Biden. He gives his opinion. He goes for the jokes. wherever they might be.
The arguments he uses aren't inherently conservative. A liberal view is that equality is better than equity. Everyone should have a chance, but none a chance greater than any other.
Wokesters don't believe that. They believe that some are more important than others. These special people must be elevated above all others. This must be mandated into law. Or enforced socially.
That seems like a massive backtrack.
LOL, I was just going to make the same point. I invite everyone to try to reconcile these two positions:
1. "Is it me or has Bill Maher become more conservative and cliche lately?"
2. "The "anti-wokeness" is the only thing that makes him seem conservative, and that's simply because he uses conservative arguments regarding that. I feel some people here only hear and see what they want about him. At worst, he might be a Libertarian to some extent, but that's NOT the same thing as supporting Republican ideas."
Snippets are not relevant, he does performative ventriloquist controlled opposition from time to time but he runs a propaganda show and the effect is in its totality, he has rigged panels of overwhelmingly liberal talking heads and his entire show is about mocking the right no different from the Daily Show and its spawn.
Its why he's always been endorsed by the regime and graced with paycheck in the millions.
His format is clearly aged now as the internet now allows long form discussions far beyond the sound bite roundups he can keep under his thumb. I know he's tried doing a podcast himself but it doesn't really work as he lacks depth.
...and honesty.
This is the Off Topic forum. It's fine.