Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
i mean he was objectively funny, right?
it was the first movie, and second it's a literal degenerative diseases you can do nothing about, he decided to go out on his terms, not letting himself waste away to nothing, what I don't know is if he was starting to feel the effects of it yet or not.
In the later half of his career he basically became the actor whose name you'd add to a movie to make them think the movie was better than it was. Now don't get me wrong. It's a huge credit to an actor's talent to get to the point where his name is that trusted in the first place, and I think he was able to at least maintain a steady adherence of loyal viewers even after he hit his peak. Still, I don't even think I've even heard of any of the movies he made after Happy Feet before, with the obvious exception of Happy Feet 2.
Now obviously I'm not going to say he did a bad job in films I never even heard of before now, but also, if those films were significantly popular, I think I would have heard of them by now with a name as big as Robin Williams attached to them, even if not only through osmosis.
Now there's always that chance that he could've made his magnum opus, leading to the Robin Williams reinisance, but barring that, I'd have to likely say no. The man basically stopped being relevant after 1997.
Robin Williams forewent his usual cut for the sake of the children when he accepted the role of Genie in Aladdin, but in exchange he didn't want to be used as a prominent part of the marketing campaign to avoid devaluing his brand. One of his terms was that his character would take no more than 25% of the total poster space.
Disney followed the letter of the law, but not the spirit of it. They made Genie take up as much space as they could, while making the other characters disproportionately small relative to him.
Now granted, Genie is the biggest character in the movie by far, but look at this poster for example[images6.fanpop.com]. His head alone takes up more poster space than Abu and Jasmine combined! I'm not sure if that was the offending poster (probably not), but it gives you an idea of the rift.
Angered by this sneaky betrayal, he refused to reprise the role for Return of Jafar and they hired Dan Castenella (you might know Dan better as Homer J. Simpson), to impersonate him instead.
The Walt Disney corporation and Robin Williams eventually made up for the transgression somehow (I do not remember the details), so he decided to return to the role in Aladdin and the King of Thieves. However, it was Mr. Castenella who played the role from then on in the televised series, probably because of fiduciary reasons.
No way you do not know him
There was even plenty of posts about him here as well...
But I am not understanding what does world war 2 have to do with this now 😂