安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
And I'm not making fun of him, I'm just wondering where this influx of, let's be honest, a somewhat rare thing to see around here, is coming from.
What?
even if that's true, i don't understand what you wrote in your OP thread title.
Can you point it out? What wrong with the sentence.
So I can debate about it.
They're cool looking. Not terrible weapons, a little slow, not much ammo, but they pack a punch.
Use case is a little situational though.
Great for avoiding getting splattered by oncoming vehicles. Next to a rocket launcher or a grav lift, that's probably your next best bet.
Shotgun wins out against it though. And depending on range, both lose out to a sniper rifle UNLESS you're sneaking up from behind.
It'll also lose out to the hammer, but I mean, the hammer can literally deflect its shots with timing. UNLESS the distance is right, then you can win against the hammer.
It still pretty frequently loses out to the sword though, but that's a tight call and the catch with that is that it really comes down to button response time, who takes which actions first.
It's not bad, but like I said, use case is situational.
and no i dont think how powerful you are