Should men raise their dating standards to compete with women?

[Mega Ultra Chicken]

Then we can live in a celibate society

[Netaris]

İlk olarak cat staccs tarafından gönderildi:

La première vague de féminisme était une bonne chose, tu te fous du féminisme parce que ça te concerne pas.

Je vois les dommages que ça a provoqué surtout, une division de la société comme rarement auparavant, en plus de tous les autres problèmes qui nous arrivent en pleine tronche de plus en plus. Si le féminisme produisait des effets positifs il ne me dérangerait pas, mais en réalité c'est juste une saloperie de plus à gérer. La réalité c'est qu'on serait mieux armés pour faire face aux autres problèmes actuels si au moins les gens lambdas étaient unis dans l'épreuve, ce qui ne peut pas être le cas avec ce genre de divisions stupides.

Le féminisme n'existe que pour vendre des magazines et diviser hommes et femmes alors qu'ils sont censés être partenaires. Je ne vois aucune raison de trouver des excuses à cette idéologie, promue par une minorité de bourges qui profitent de ces divisions dans la société.

On doit faire reculer cette corruption idéologique des gens, pour retrouver des êtres humains normaux, débarrassés de cette influence malveillante.

[AerSilver ♞]

İlk olarak cat staccs tarafından gönderildi:

When a man says he is not a feminist it is a huge redflag.

lmfao. I think that's enough off topic for me right now, good luck debating that if you care enough.

[Γαῖα]

İlk olarak Ad Victoriam ! tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak AerSilver ♞ tarafından gönderildi:

"I can fix her" :hskull:
Problem is after all this filtering very few women are left as valid candidates.
Still better than dealing with a headache of a woman, ofc.

Well, in america maybe, but in societies less harmed by these BS, there is still plenty of normal women to date anyway. Especially if you meet peoples without using the internet, real life peoples tend to be less corrupted by all these nonsense. Men and women are supposed to be allies in life, to be in the same team building a family and so on. I just don't want to lose my time with peoples who don't seem able to understand something as simple as that.

Thing is it doesn't just take the internet to mould minds as magazines, books and changing times has changed the sexes. Women nolonger just think of getting married, having a family and living happy ever after. Now they want and do carve out careers, independence long before thinking of children (do note children rather than marriage and then children).
It really wasn't that long ago many women often tutored by their mother let alone society were led to believe the road was all about settling down and relying on another. The world was also rather confined to where one lived when considering suitors.
So its to be expected untarnished by the past and evolving generations that females would take the roads they do whether its accepted by an individual/male consensus or not.

Nothing happens over night so feel how women are conducting themselves irrespective of others views is perfectly normal and will continue until they find the right sort of balance for themselves which they will. As such men/males who many of which aren't exactly conducting themselves tip top either need to practice a whole lot of patience and understanding as to how things currently are.

[חולית לחיים]

İlk olarak cat staccs tarafından gönderildi:

When a woman says she is a feminist it is a huge redflag.

fixed it for ya, yw.

[Phénomènes Mystiques]

I wonder what those incels and neck beards have to say…

[אדון סקוויד]

İlk olarak Wynters tarafından gönderildi:

I wonder what those incels and neck beards have to say… :csdsmile:

ask reddit i guess. still, claiming that men who aren't feminists are walking red flags is the most retarded thing i have heard this week.

[Crusader (Banned13x)]

İlk olarak SlowMango tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak Crusader (Banned5x) tarafından gönderildi:

Sane women = Women of good moral integrity, not indoctrinated by radical ideologies or consumed with self-centered pleasure-seeking.

"Subservient slave women" is the strawman feminists and their supporters enjoy hacking at to justify hedonistic lifestyles.

Which, coincidentally, only involves women who are more subservient. Also known as "trad wives".

Wanting cooperation doesn't mean wanting subservience. What many men don't want is a woman trying to become the "boss", and disregard anything he says while claiming men are "oppresors", even though men have protected women from the dawn of time. But yes, women who are more subservient is traditional feature.

Anyone who rejects God and the Holy Bible, the values of which built modern Western civilization, will of course hate such a notion. And that's what we see plenty of today. But rejecting such things is why men and women are more unhappy today and divorce rates and families are being destroyed. Why someone thinks these results are fine, I don't know.

1 Timothy 2:9-14

"In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;

But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.

Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.

But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression."

[Boblin the Goblin]

İlk olarak Crusader (Banned5x) tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak SlowMango tarafından gönderildi:

Which, coincidentally, only involves women who are more subservient. Also known as "trad wives".

Wanting cooperation doesn't mean wanting subservience. What many men don't want is a woman trying to become the "boss", and disregard anything he says while claiming men are "oppresors", even though men have protected women from the dawn of time. But yes, women who are more subservient is traditional feature.

Anyone who rejects God and the Holy Bible, the values of which built modern Western civilization, will of course hate such a notion. And that's what we see plenty of today. But rejecting such things is why men and women are more unhappy today and divorce rates and families are being destroyed. Why someone thinks these results are fine, I don't know.

1 Timothy 2:9-14

"In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;

But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.

Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.

But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression."

You do realize you are just proving what I said initially that you just want a subservient woman?

[Crusader (Banned13x)]

İlk olarak SlowMango tarafından gönderildi:

You do realize you are just proving what I said initially that you just want a subservient woman?

No, I'm saying many men don't want "bosses" for partners. Even men who aren't of any faith.

I'm also saying that traditional Western values are rejected because those values come from the Holy Bible, which people are also rejecting. It's a correlating moral issue. But people act like it isn't.

[Boblin the Goblin]

İlk olarak Crusader (Banned5x) tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak SlowMango tarafından gönderildi:

You do realize you are just proving what I said initially that you just want a subservient woman?

No, I'm saying many men don't want "bosses" for partners. Even men who aren't of any faith.

I'm also saying that traditional Western values are rejected because those values come from the Holy Bible, which people are also rejecting. It's a correlating moral issue. But people act like it isn't.

You literally just posted passages that are about women being subservient to men. If that's the "morals" you want women to have, you are just wanting women to be subservient to men.

[Netaris]

İlk olarak Γαῖα tarafından gönderildi:

Thing is it doesn't just take the internet to mould minds as magazines, books and changing times has changed the sexes. Women nolonger just think of getting married, having a family and living happy ever after. Now they want and do carve out careers, independence long before thinking of children (do note children rather than marriage and then children).
It really wasn't that long ago many women often tutored by their mother let alone society were led to believe the road was all about settling down and relying on another. The world was also rather confined to where one lived when considering suitors.
So its to be expected untarnished by the past and evolving generations that females would take the roads they do whether its accepted by an individual/male consensus or not.

Nothing happens over night so feel how women are conducting themselves irrespective of others views is perfectly normal and will continue until they find the right sort of balance for themselves which they will. As such men/males who many of which aren't exactly conducting themselves tip top either need to practice a whole lot of patience and understanding as to how things currently are.

That's the thing, in reality nothing has changed, except the influence on peoples. Realities still apply to peoples the same and such ideologies make individuals weak in front of those realities that never change. How many alone childless cat ladies because of feminist BS ? We already know how these things end, when women grow old, childless, with a carreer, they in beautifull appartments, but alone frustrated and with only cats as company. The happiest women I've seen are those who had childrens and a stable long term relationship with the right person for them. The carreer is irrelevant if it replace the main thing that will make life worth it for you and for most women, it's having childrens.

What make me laugh is a lot of peoples seem to forget that mariage was made for women, so they'll be able to secure a men for themselves with less risks he'll go for a younger one at some point. A lot of peoples also seem to forget that we have the datas now to know that childs raised by single moms are way more likely to engage in criminal activities, drugs and other bad stuff like that. Fathers are needed too, they need to have a place and to be respected.

So yes, from my point of view, feminism is a malevolent influence, that give life advices that'll make your life miserable if you follow those. And I don't want to have to deal with the corrupted beings it produce, because along with themselves they'll make my life miserable too. Well, no thanks.

[Boblin the Goblin]

İlk olarak Ad Victoriam ! tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak Γαῖα tarafından gönderildi:

Thing is it doesn't just take the internet to mould minds as magazines, books and changing times has changed the sexes. Women nolonger just think of getting married, having a family and living happy ever after. Now they want and do carve out careers, independence long before thinking of children (do note children rather than marriage and then children).
It really wasn't that long ago many women often tutored by their mother let alone society were led to believe the road was all about settling down and relying on another. The world was also rather confined to where one lived when considering suitors.
So its to be expected untarnished by the past and evolving generations that females would take the roads they do whether its accepted by an individual/male consensus or not.

Nothing happens over night so feel how women are conducting themselves irrespective of others views is perfectly normal and will continue until they find the right sort of balance for themselves which they will. As such men/males who many of which aren't exactly conducting themselves tip top either need to practice a whole lot of patience and understanding as to how things currently are.

That's the thing, in reality nothing has changed, except the influence on peoples. Realities still apply to peoples the same and such ideologies make individuals weak in front of those realities that never change. How many alone childless cat ladies because of feminist BS ? We already know how these things end, when women grow old, childless, with a carreer, they in beautifull appartments, but alone frustrated and with only cats as company. The happiest women I've seen are those who had childrens and a stable long term relationship with the right person for them. The carreer is irrelevant if it replace the main thing that will make life worth it for you and for most women, it's having childrens.

What make me laugh is a lot of peoples seem to forget that mariage was made for women, so they'll be able to secure a men for themselves with less risks he'll go for a younger one at some point. A lot of peoples also seem to forget that we have the datas now to know that childs raised by single moms are way more likely to engage in criminal activities, drugs and other bad stuff like that. Fathers are needed too, they need to have a place and to be respected.

So yes, from my point of view, feminism is a malevolent influence, that give life advices that'll make your life miserable if you follow those. And I don't want to have to deal with the corrupted beings it produce, because along with themselves they'll make my life miserable too. Well, no thanks.

Marriage wasn't "made for women".

[76561198879843338]

Feminism has never been about equality. It is about retribution and restitution. Feminists believe women are superheroes and victims at the same time. Simply put, it is a plague that defiles society and destroys the nuclear family.

[Netaris]

İlk olarak cat staccs tarafından gönderildi:

Le féminisme est simplement la mise en valeur de la femme au sein de la société française à travers le principe fondamental que les femmes et les hommes sont parfaitement égaux en droits. Avant d'être une idéologie, c'est un principe auquel tout le monde devrait souscrire en fait, qu'on tolère les dérives plus récentes ou non.

Quand quelqu'un dit qu'il est anti féministe ça laisse entendre qu'il est effrayé par une femme capable de faire de l'argent pour subvenir à ses propres besoins, qu'il se fout de sa volonté d'exister en tant qu'individu indépendante de l'homme et qu'il se fiche de sa sécurité.

Le féminisme n'est qu'un "-isme" de plus, tout aussi néfaste que les autres. Je me tiens loin des drones dirigés par leur idéologie, je veux fréquenter des êtres humains, pas des gens pilotés à distance par des magazines, articles et autres outils d'influence.

[Crusader (Banned13x)]

İlk olarak SlowMango tarafından gönderildi:

You literally just posted passages that are about women being subservient to men. If that's the "morals" you want women to have, you are just wanting women to be subservient to men.

I don't want subservience. What I want is people of moral integrity, healthy families, happy marriages, happy children. Because the Bible mentions subservience, and people hate God and the Bible, all those morals that go along with them are also being tossed out. Baby thrown out with the bathwater.

But if women not being subservient leads to all this madness and dysfunction in society, yes, I would prefer it over this. Is subservience wrong, or is it just that the sound of it is something you cannot accept? Is there no natural order to the world? God as head over man, man as head over the woman, woman as head over the children, bosses over employees, etc?

What's wrong with it even if subservience is practiced? Acting like subservience is something to be rejected outright is a moral issue, that's what I'm pointing out.