Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm not a lawyer and don't know a lot about the legal system, but I do think the game should still be sold, even if they were to take out the copyrighted music.
both GTA 4 and Alan Wake been taken off the stores for a while when this happened.
GTA 4 had songs removed while Alan Wake developers just renewed their license.
no
It's extremely ironic that a less resourceful company (Remedy) decided to renew the license while Rockstar simply removed the songs lol.
When they're part of a big collection of songs on a radio station, that might be simple.
When it's a song that was specifically chosen to fit into a whole scene as part of the experience/composition/atmosphere/etc. . . not so easy. Well, yes, still 'easy' - but only if you effectively destroy that scene.
And if a game isn't making that much money any more, re-licensing might not be considered worth it for many devs/publishers.
It's not 'resourceful' or not - as I mentioned, I'm sure the Alan Wake song was important to the game. While GTA has lots of songs, a few removed here and there doesn't make much difference.
(also, the GTA series is different. The release of Alan Wake 2 would encourage sales of AW1 for people wanting to catch up on the full story. So Remedy would want to keep it in full working order. The release of GTA 6 isn't likely to drive sales of GTA 5 or 4.)