Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Also, remember - it's easier to argue self defense if you're the only one who survives that engagement. As in if you use less-than-lethal force that can and will be held against you in the court of law. Same is true for home invasion.
Course, disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
That is a very odd way to rule a court. The man who is shot is alive. If I had the intention to kill i would make sure of it. That is why serial murders actual kill their victims and not just let them go.
500 magnum can’t do this!
The purpose of the legal system is to manage resource depletion.
This outcome makes sense in that context.
9mm is a time tested, battle proven, practical cartridge designed to actually serve a purpose of defense, and actual fights.
There's no contest, 9mm is a serious caliber, .500 Magnum is basically clown shoes.
According to crime statistics about 2 million people in the US use them for self defense every year. This includes older people fending off home invaders, women fending off predators, etc. I would be embarrassed to make your comment.