Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
The bill doesn't.
It certainly explains the farmer uprisings though.
Maybe they'll help write a better constitution for the next government.
Understanding hate speech is like understand cyberbullying. Some might claim it even doesn't exist, but it clearly does and needs to be addressed.
After WWII, Germany criminalized Volksverhetzung ("incitement of popular hatred") to prevent resurgence of Nazism. That's where we learnt to block hate speech.
Your online Freedom of Speech is actually protected by preventing the Hate Speech and Cyberbullying. It gives everyone a fair and equal voice, without being threatened into silence.
Hate Speech is the discrimination of a certain group's race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or similar, in which they threaten that group into not having their own voiced and freedom of speech.
Even Hitler cried for freedom of speech, while spewing hate speech towards the LGBTQ and then the entire Jewish race. It's a form of well-known censorship upon actual free speech and therefore almost everything on the entire Internet has rules against it.
For example:
The Steam Online Conduct
https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/6862-8119-C23E-EA7B
There are many shared spaces on Steam where players can engage in public discussion. In addition to the online conduct rules, players and developers should adhere to the following guidelines to ensure that these shared places remain constructive and respectful:
Be respectful of yourself and other players
Interactions with other players should not be abusive, disparaging, or inflammatory, nor create an environment that is unwelcoming.
Examples of disrespectful content include:
- Insults or harassment
- Threats or encouragement of harm
- Trolling or baiting arguments
- Discrimination
- Bypassing word or content filters
- Public accusations towards others
All that actually just covers 'Hate Speech'.
I don't get what you are trying to get at?
I was previously questioning perhaps some find this new bill change as being authoritarian or something and that's why they are against it? Yet they ironically more authoritarian figures.
Did you need an example of how they are authoritarian figures? Yet how does all that relate to the Section 10?
I have some steaks to grill while I read a book, outside (gasp)..
Musk is pretty rich and handsome, so it makes sense. And if you marry him, he'll have a bunker for you as a WEF member.
a science article pointing out an issue has been labelled disinformation yet it is peer reviewed science.
therefore labeling speech can be just as abused, not saying it will be but it could be depending on the people in power
Yes and one of his many ex-wives has married and divorced him twice. She received a settlement of $4.2 million and next time Musk agreed to a settlement of $16 million. She then stated "Elon Musk is the perfect ex-husband" and is totally willing to remarry him again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vwNcNOTVzY
Meanwhile Elon Musk's own transgender child disowned him, wanting nothing to do with his money nor fame, and legally had a name change as soon as they turned of age to do so.
I'm personally more like the one that would disown and not care at all about the money.