Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Then you are confusing people and you are liable for getting misgendered ( which is actually no one should be offended about). In my language we don't even have pronouns.
It makes written correspondence unbearable.
Surely there's a better alternative than "they/them" that's inclusive of non binary etc people?
For the record I suppose referring to people by their chosen pronouns so long as they make grammatical sense and don't conflict with fundamental rules of grammar.
Non binary? What's that ?
Right.
And this is why the pro-Russia sentiment grows.
As far as I'm aware there has not existed a true human hermaphrodite, i.e a person with both male and female reproductive organs who can impregnate a woman and also give birth.
That said, there has existed throughout human history people who have reproductive organs of one gender but also have some some bits of the other gender at birth. They used to be called hermaphrodites but this isn't an accurate term for the reasons mentioned above, therefore intersex is the more accurate term. Traditionally, surgery at birth has been carried out to remove these bits and enforce the predominant gender but studies have shown that this causes psychological problems in adulthood.
So there does exist in nature humans who have been born with intersex traits. It is rare, but more common than being born a red head.