Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
so you're happy, what about it?
You did... So you just proved yourself wrong
Also that at least 25 ppl have read it v:
not my business to know what the OP or anyone else does unless the situation warrants it and it don't in this case. The only time i'll check if i get the suspicion that the user is up to no good, usually spammers, then i'll check their post history, 100% of the time i dead on the mark where my suspicion becomes fact. what is considered "no good" is more a case by case basis based on the situation, which is different from the usual nonsense out here.
Just do it