Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
but wait...
Yes, that’s right. This is the man who proudly halted the construction of Trump’s border wall and oversaw an influx of illegal migrants into this country that is unprecedented in scope, and now he is posing as the Cassandra who has been warning us about the crisis at the border for ten years, which would take us back to 2014.
Let’s see. Who was president of the United States in 2014? If Biden had his way, we wouldn’t quite be able to remember, but I believe it was a fellow who was fairly close to Old Joe. If my memory serves me well, Biden himself may have been involved in that administration.
Of course, Biden didn’t mean it was Obama’s fault. He appears to have been blaming those dastardly Republicans who have apparently spent a decade rejecting his requests for funding to secure the border. When Henrich asked him if his own disastrous regime’s policies had any share in the blame for the catastrophe at the border, he responded: “No, I’ve…I’ve asked for thousands more, of everything – from judges to…anyway.” He asked for money from judges? Sure, Joe. Have another ice cream cone.
SCOTUS ruled 5-4 in favor of Biden administration.
"Supreme Court allows Biden administration to remove razor wire on US-Mexico border in 5-4 vote "
"The justices’ order is a major victory for President Joe Biden in his ongoing dispute with Abbott over border policy, which had become especially fraught in recent days after three migrants drowned in a section of the Rio Grande that state officials have blocked agents’ access to, prompting the administration to further press for the high court’s intervention."
-- from the article
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/22/politics/supreme-court-texas-razor-wire?cid=ios_app
This means I was correct in my assessment of the situation per my comment #180, #194
No, it means a state can't illegally place down tons of razor wire across waterways and private properties, which has caused injury, a miscarriage and even deaths.
It isn't anything to do about allowing them in or not, rather Texas wants to deny being checked up for a $11 million unethical blunder. The Texas state spent $11 million on that precious razor wire, which needed to get cut multiple times to free people from. They would rather the person just dies and perhaps just leave the body there to decompose, than waste that money each time.
American priorities with again scapegoat excuses. It's like them wanting to keep their guns and suggesting lets give schools guns to help with the school shootings... I mean prevent them?
"Texans flock to social media to demand the state 'secede' after losing at Supreme Court"
https://www.rawstory.com/texas-secede-border-ruling/
they cant go to police for help
the guy who drives up at home depot and says he will pay them at end of day could not pay them and they would be slave for a day.
this compasdion of letting em in isnt really compassion but exploitation