Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Me neither, I was just mentioning an example to demonstrate that beauty is subjective.
But I do take issue with people that feel attracted by the image of minors, whether it is a real photo or "just art".
Well, it seems that you've missed the point of my post: no one here dictates what questions are allowed, people are free to ask whatever they want.
I see. Well at least they're trying to do something good. We'll just have to see if they go mainstream.
Seems like Japan is trying to do less censorship while the west is trying to do more censorship.
Not that one. The question was related to this post:
In addition to that, it's important to keep in mind that boys have always played "war" in real life.
It requires it to be indistinguishable from a real minor.
It's the same as snuff films. I don't find Saw comfortable but it's still not real. Unless a child is actually hurt in filming, an identifiable person, meaning an actual real life person, there's no cost, it's just creepy like sadistic content of Saw.