What did they Build Back Better? Can you name one?

[Saiba Jinzero]

Collapsing Banks ✅
Record Breaking inflation ✅
Lowest marketing in history✅
Dollar Value collapse ✅
Inflation Reduction Act? = Tax more people ✅ (goes to Ukraine/Israel. not you anyway)
10% goes for them.
Free for all borders?
cocain/phedo in the white house?
Making talibans great again?
or they meant build back better ukraine? not america?
arrest political opponent or supports?
takes Trump credits?
I can keep going...

Bush = Russia Invaded Georgia
Obama = Russia Invaded Crimea
Biden = Russia Invaded Ukraine
Trump = Russia Invaded nothing!! They didn't do sh*t north korea was acting up but Trump put them to their place. Russia didn't do sh*t. If trump was president today, the war would be over in 24 hours. But it benefits democrats spending Trillion of dollar. They just send another 200 million but 300 billion can't fix?

I just want to know one good thing they did please and thank you.

[Fajita Jim]

Publicado originalmente por repaeR:

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

🙄

Do you have anything to add to the conversation or are you just going to continue acting that childish?

Do you?

Or just "Tell me you don't understand the subject without telling me you don't understand the subject"?

You keep wagging that around but not doing anything with it. What the hell is your point? You're all over the place, making no sense.

[permanent name]

Publicado originalmente por Heitor Villa-Lobos:

US-Pol should get its own Steam© Subforum, preferably named Spam.

How about a 'Not Worth It' forum?

[repaeR]

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

Publicado originalmente por repaeR:

Do you?

Or just "Tell me you don't understand the subject without telling me you don't understand the subject"?

You keep wagging that around but not doing anything with it. What the hell is your point? You're all over the place, making no sense.

The one that wagged around is you. You couldn't understand a budget deficit and tried to deny how a real full balance budget should be run. Like, do you even understand how much a dollar worth today, comparing 4-5 years ago? in such short amount of time? No, you don't.
How about just crawling back to being a shill?

[Fajita Jim]

Publicado originalmente por repaeR:

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

You keep wagging that around but not doing anything with it. What the hell is your point? You're all over the place, making no sense.

The one that wagged around is you. You couldn't understand a budget deficit and tried to deny how a real full balance budget should be run. Like, do you even understand how much a dollar worth today, comparing 4-5 years ago? in such short amount of time? No, you don't.
How about just crawling back to being a shill?

We were talking about the GDP. You went off on the above. I said you didn't understand it, because you don't. And you just proved it again.

Here's a hint: GDP is not a measure of wealth, it's a measure of PRODUCTION. If no one showed up for work tomorrow, the GDP for that day would be 0. It doesn't matter how much money anyone has/owes.

It's like we're talking about food and you just start going off about math, and then claim somehow the two are related.

Sit down. You got the whole crew laughing.

[repaeR]

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

Publicado originalmente por repaeR:

The one that wagged around is you. You couldn't understand a budget deficit and tried to deny how a real full balance budget should be run. Like, do you even understand how much a dollar worth today, comparing 4-5 years ago? in such short amount of time? No, you don't.
How about just crawling back to being a shill?

We were talking about the GDP. You went off on the above. I said you didn't understand it, because you don't. And you just proved it again.

Here's a hint: GDP is not a measure of wealth, it's a measure of PRODUCTION. If no one showed up for work tomorrow, the GDP for that day would be 0. It doesn't matter how much money anyone has/owes.

It's like we're talking about food and you just start going off about math, and then claim somehow the two are related.

Sit down. You got the whole crew laughing.

Yea, and it's meaningless if you couldn't run a basic balance budget.

Nobody gives a beep if you could do this, or do that, what is it good if you can't profit at the end of the day? Or, at least you can't cover up your loss in the future?

Money is already crap, and here this guy here can't even understand that if he at least knows how to run budget deficit, he would know that GDP is negative.

Maybe it's you that should shut up, and stop gas-lighting people eh?

[Majestic Turkey]

I remember even the apologist CNN article had to grasp at straws for projects that weren't just going into a sink hole.

Biden regime has only brought death and destruction, triple conflict and loss of all credibility in the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqNWKJENDLY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcZcjpEKI-M

No one wants to fight for the America last regime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV4zLaevnWs

As they allow invasion into our borders and force states to tear down their fences
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjjt8lj6oq0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWAjOCmehoU

While letting the people rot at home.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJHXLYLjxng
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igPGGOLhQUE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQdGCbPCPtM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjTqZ8VvoME

Because they are natural traitors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQZqwszd21E

[Fajita Jim]

Publicado originalmente por repaeR:

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

We were talking about the GDP. You went off on the above. I said you didn't understand it, because you don't. And you just proved it again.

Here's a hint: GDP is not a measure of wealth, it's a measure of PRODUCTION. If no one showed up for work tomorrow, the GDP for that day would be 0. It doesn't matter how much money anyone has/owes.

It's like we're talking about food and you just start going off about math, and then claim somehow the two are related.

Sit down. You got the whole crew laughing.

Yea, and it's meaningless if you couldn't run a basic balance budget.

Nobody gives a beep if you could do this, or do that, what is it good if you can't profit at the end of the day? Or, at least you can't cover up your loss in the future?

Money is already crap, and here this guy here can't even understand that if he at least knows how to run budget deficit, he would know that GDP is negative.

Maybe it's you that should shut up, and stop gas-lighting people eh?

Here's a guy that thinks debt has ANYTHING AT ALL to do with GDP. Economics 101 failed.

[Dom]

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

Publicado originalmente por repaeR:

Yea, and it's meaningless if you couldn't run a basic balance budget.

Nobody gives a beep if you could do this, or do that, what is it good if you can't profit at the end of the day? Or, at least you can't cover up your loss in the future?

Money is already crap, and here this guy here can't even understand that if he at least knows how to run budget deficit, he would know that GDP is negative.

Maybe it's you that should shut up, and stop gas-lighting people eh?

Here's a guy that thinks debt has ANYTHING AT ALL to do with GDP. Economics 101 failed.

It doesn't have anything to do with GDP but it's measured to GDP and I think that's a good way to measure the stability and economic strength of the country.

As long as a country manages a good debt-to-GDP ratio, it doesn't really matter if the country is in debt, generally speaking. Because if the debt-to-GDP is good (lower) then the country's production greatly exceeds what they owe, and that means they have the capabilities to handle the debt, and pay back without having to make cuts that ultimately affect people.

And not only that but debt is a complex concept overall. Most of the debt that countries generally have they owe to themselves; to the institutions and companies that are owned by the government.

[Fajita Jim]

Publicado originalmente por Dom:

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

Here's a guy that thinks debt has ANYTHING AT ALL to do with GDP. Economics 101 failed.

It doesn't have anything to do with GDP

Right. And a RECESSION is when the GDP contracts, which it hasn't done despite the doomsaying. Which was the original point being made.

[repaeR]

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

Publicado originalmente por repaeR:

Yea, and it's meaningless if you couldn't run a basic balance budget.

Nobody gives a beep if you could do this, or do that, what is it good if you can't profit at the end of the day? Or, at least you can't cover up your loss in the future?

Money is already crap, and here this guy here can't even understand that if he at least knows how to run budget deficit, he would know that GDP is negative.

Maybe it's you that should shut up, and stop gas-lighting people eh?

Here's a guy that thinks debt has ANYTHING AT ALL to do with GDP. Economics 101 failed.

Yea your economy 101 failed when you work at Mcdonald, and then try to buy a lamborghini, but then can't stop talking about your own "GDP".

[Fajita Jim]

Publicado originalmente por repaeR:

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

Here's a guy that thinks debt has ANYTHING AT ALL to do with GDP. Economics 101 failed.

Yea your economy 101 failed when you work at Mcdonald, and then try to buy a lamborghini, but then can't stop talking about your own "GDP".

Seriously? Yeah, you're down.
Bye.

[repaeR]

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

Publicado originalmente por repaeR:

Yea your economy 101 failed when you work at Mcdonald, and then try to buy a lamborghini, but then can't stop talking about your own "GDP".

Seriously? Yeah, you're down.
Bye.

Publicado originalmente por Fajita Jim:

Publicado originalmente por Dom:

It doesn't have anything to do with GDP

Right. And a RECESSION is when the GDP contracts, which it hasn't done despite the doomsaying. Which was the original point being made.

Nah, it's you.

Here are simple answers for you: Starting wars, Selling weapons and Printing enormous money paper….

[Uncle Sam]

Publicado originalmente por permanent name:

Publicado originalmente por Heitor Villa-Lobos:

US-Pol should get its own Steam© Subforum, preferably named Spam.

How about a 'Not Worth It' forum?

It isn't that the nickname of all corporate & algorithm oriented mainstream social media like Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Tiktok, Discord, etc? I mean it's side effects are very easy to see given current Political polarization...

[Fajita Jim]

Publicado originalmente por Saiba Jinzero:

It's so sad that crying libs still can't find one... it's 2024

I've given a few examples. You can keep your eyes and ears plugged and live in Q world, as you're obviously bound to do, but don't act like half this thread isn't here.

[BigBallinChester]

Publicado originalmente por Saiba Jinzero:

Collapsing Banks ✅
Record Breaking inflation ✅
Lowest marketing in history✅
Dollar Value collapse ✅
Inflation Reduction Act? = Tax more people ✅ (goes to Ukraine/Israel. not you anyway)
10% goes for them.
Free for all borders?
cocain/phedo in the white house?
Making talibans great again?
or they meant build back better ukraine? not america?
arrest political opponent or supports?
takes Trump credits?
I can keep going...

Bush = Russia Invaded Georgia
Obama = Russia Invaded Crimea
Biden = Russia Invaded Ukraine
Trump = Russia Invaded nothing!! They didn't do sh*t north korea was acting up but Trump put them to their place. Russia didn't do sh*t. If trump was president today, the war would be over in 24 hours. But it benefits democrats spending Trillion of dollar. They just send another 200 million but 300 billion can't fix?

I just want to know one good thing they did please and thank you.

Russia didn't need to invade when Trump was in office because Trump gave Russia, American military bases.