Lawful good is the only acceptable ethical alignment

[Devsman]

It can be fun to pretend, but for your actual day-to-day living, if you are anything but lawful good, you are living life wrong.

[aka]

Well said.

Jolly good

[76561198356019466]

Yeah, but it's BORING!!!

Chaotic good! Be the anti-hero. Han Solo, Mad Max. That's the way to go.

[St✩rlight]

Are the wealthiest people lawful good

[76561198356019466]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Munithe EXT:

Are the wealthiest people lawful good

Lara Croft is the only really wealthy game protagonist I can think of, and I'd classify her as chaotic good.

[Hobbit XIII]

I disagree, chaotic neutral is the best way to be.

[St✩rlight]

Oprindeligt skrevet af tiny E:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Munithe EXT:

Are the wealthiest people lawful good

Lara Croft is the only really wealthy game protagonist I can think of, and I'd classify her as chaotic good.

I think she is chaotic evil

[76561198356019466]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Munithe EXT:

Oprindeligt skrevet af tiny E:

Lara Croft is the only really wealthy game protagonist I can think of, and I'd classify her as chaotic good.

I think she is chaotic evil

I agree it's up in the air. It merits further discussion, but I'm not really up for that now.

[76561199445701497]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Devsman:

It can be fun to pretend, but for your actual day-to-day living, if you are anything but lawful good, you are living life wrong.

But ... your posts do not paint you as lawful good. More like chaotic neutral.

[envirovore]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Hobbit XIII:

I disagree, chaotic neutral is the best way to be.

It's certainly the most entertaining

[Devsman]

Oprindeligt skrevet af tiny E:

Yeah, but it's BORING!!!

Chaotic good! Be the anti-hero. Han Solo, Mad Max. That's the way to go.

I would go so far as to say chaotic good doesn't exist. Classic examples like V who do good by opposing the authorities are still lawful good.

The way I see it, law is an objective quality that can be observed but not defined. And these V types simply have a better grasp of it than the authorities they fight against.

Allow me to demonstrate. If guy is kidnapping random people off the street to torture and kill them in his basement, you're clearly going to identify this guy as a bad guy. If he says "no no, it's ok because I say so," he's still a bad guy. Because this guy is not the authority on right and wrong.

Now, if you take that same guy and make give him a title like president, and give him a bunch of cronies who do the actual kidnapping torturing and murdering, he's still a bad guy. And if he says "no no it's legal because I say so," he's still not lawful. Because he's not the authority on law. And he clearly doesn't understand it at all.

Simply put, by being good, you are necessarily lawful, because if you were being unlawful, you would be being evil. But it doesn't work the other way around. You can be evil and still lawful. Such as telling lies.

[Devsman]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Henry Gamer:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Devsman:

It can be fun to pretend, but for your actual day-to-day living, if you are anything but lawful good, you are living life wrong.

But ... your posts do not paint you as lawful good. More like chaotic neutral.

I'm not perfect; more at 11.

[Pieshaman]

well you might be right, I see myself as chaotic good ( i can't even put myself to play evil in rpg videogames) yet I seen the inside of a jail multiple times cause with what I think is good and right not always align with the law xd

[Rio]

Lawful Evil rules the world.

And if the law won't let you do what you want to do, you change the law or make it not apply to you.

[Pieshaman]

Oprindeligt skrevet af ⛧:

Lawful Evil rules the world

I dont see it that way, those are the types that always have to look over their shoulder, how is that truly ruling?

[ZZZZZ]

isnt chaotic and neutral better? many laws and social norms are in favor of the ruling class