安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Fictitious person: Pepe the Frog
No matter who wins... humanity loses.
Vladimir Putin's evil stunt double. He's got like 300 of them, so NATO will always win.
isn't that supposed to be Ferdinand Foch?
If you always do as your told and don't mind that your neighbour spoke out against the regime and is now locked up somewhere then sure you would not need to be afraid.
Vote Bean Party!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLrwV_gIq3U
That video is too realistic.
'when i become an MP i will go and shout at all the other MPs' the house of commons is ridiculous for that kind of thing.
I do like his energy saving policy : get Anneka Rice to stop moving.
Some good points but it is not about what I want it is what do you want.
Anybody who is not sure who the Amish are :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOfZLb33uCg
I agree The Amish way of handling things works, if we put one of these Amish in charge of NATO Putin would have thought twice about messing with other peoples property.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIbRR7cc4VI
As Yoda would say 'reveal yourself you have'
Your a map painter, so you would know how to draw the map of the world which is good, but are you sure you would not get a little generous with NATO boundaries and claim a few countries for your own private 'use' ?
Fictional and a pig that likes pepper?
you ever seen a pig take a dump and sneeze at the same time?
I suppose it could work as a deterrent force, 'hey you jerk! This is our defensive strategy! '
aim one end at Putin and the other at Xi .
I think there is a genius in that reasoning of yours.
We will put you in charge of beverages at the next UN meeting and let you work your magic on Russian officials.
But how would we know which one was the stunt double we wanted?
To quote him from 2002 :
They the Israeli soldiers are very brave people... they are idealists... they want to serve their country and they want to prove themselves. The problem is that you cannot prove yourself against someone who is much weaker than yourself. They are in a lose-lose situation. If you are strong and fighting the weak, then if you kill your opponent then you are a scoundrel... if you let him kill you, then you are an idiot. So here is a dilemma which others have suffered before us, and for which as far as I can see there is simply no escape. Now the Israeli army has not by any means been the worst of the lot. It has not done what for instance the Americans did in Vietnam... it did not use napalm, it did not kill millions of people. So everything is relative, but by definition, to return to what I said earlier if you are strong and you are fighting the weak, then anything you do is criminal.
On a lighter side I would love to see feminists do their tank on him for his views on female oppression.
His view on how many armies are training for conventional war rather than low intensity conflicts is true to a certain extent but then Russia invaded Ukraine.
I do agree there does need to be more focus on none conventional units problem is so many people in civilians and political do not understand they really do not see it so there is little demand for it.
An interesting choice.
Eisenhower, a very good choice he had the intelligence, the diplomacy to navigate the allies and their rivalries even between their own people.
I have not played Mass Effect so cannot comment other than its a smart uniform he wears reminds me of 'adult' entertainment types.
A good mix of people.
Are there anymore out there?
My suggestion was Rommel.
I do not know if he ever read Sun Tzu's Art of War but his ability on capturing the enemy and numerous victories shows he had a real flair for strategy.
To capture the enemy is not only humane but practical too when the Nazis executed American prisoners of war that gave many American soldiers the reality that they may not be able to sit out the war in a camp but could face death if they surrendered.
the rest is history as they say.
Wrong. The head of NATO does not command anything nor does he make political decisions.
Currently its a Norwegian dude who also took command during Breivik's terrorist attack and hunted him down.
the beginning words set the stage of this discussion : In this scenario
And don't make this into an English context debate please, its just a forum game played as sensibly or as silly as people like.