Alex Jones has returned to Twitter.

[Ȃ̷̛́͌̚͝r̵c̸̛̒͐̅̇]

After 5 years he has returned into the platform of Elon Musk and was praised by Andrew Tate on lifting the 5 year ban.

US is slowly becoming more in of waking up before the presidential election in 2024 which may be in favor of the Orange Man.

[Ulfrinn]

Postat inițial de Chunk Norris ☯:

Postat inițial de doug:

Oh great, another right wing extremist circle jerk. We didn't have enough of those.

When did the left lose sight of giving people basic Civil Rights/Constitutional rights? Isn't that what makes a liberal, a liberal?

Everyone had it by time the 14th amendment was written so they had to start making ♥♥♥♥ up to try to stay relevant. And that meant creating victims where there weren't any.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Postat inițial de dominikrni:

Postat inițial de Chunk Norris ☯:

When did the left lose sight of giving people basic Civil Rights/Constitutional rights? Isn't that what makes a liberal, a liberal?

what made you come to that conclusion?

Is a right a right when everyone gets it, or only some people? Is a privilege what we call it when only some people get it?

[videomike_Ultimate_Plushie]

Postat inițial de dominikrni:

Postat inițial de Chunk Norris ☯:

When did the left lose sight of giving people basic Civil Rights/Constitutional rights? Isn't that what makes a liberal, a liberal?

what made you come to that conclusion?

Maybe the multiple left-wing men in this chat that have claimed that a man being sentenced to a wage slavery for the rest of his life while one says slavery is okay if you label the target correctly and another saying the prosecution of a civil crime flaunting showing illegal evidence to no punishment might have given him some bias.

[Morkonan]

Postat inițial de videomike_Ultimate_Plushie:

Postat inițial de Morkonan:

And, how Jones got nailed during his testimony:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-QcbOphxYs

WHY! WHY WOULD YOU POST THAT?! If there is -one- thing that could entire DESTROY your entire argument that the judge wasnt outright set out to punish Alex regardless of any legal standing, THIS ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ video proves it. Legal is a left-winged fool who thinks lightly pressing down on someones newspaper is assault and battery so he could defend captain marvel, the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ went off his rocket and case in point -he shows the lawyers flaunting having presented illegal evidence in court.- In any sane court that act by the proesuction would have the entire case thrown out on the spot if at bare minimum the prosecution given a formal strike for doing so with thread of ending the case for trying it!

I can't believe you posted that jesus christ

You don't understand what is going on in that video, do you? Did you watch it and listen to the explanations?

The court had been requesting documents for YEARS from Jones and he would not comply, which is something he's done in several other cases.

Here, he's getting nailed for having lied, under oath, during testimony that he had no such text messages on his phone when it was ordered by the court that he produce them...

This is during the penalty phase. The order for him to submit all that discovery evidence had been issued years previously, as I understand it, during Trial phase. Since he refused, he found out - The judge issued summary judgement because he refused to participate and abide by a court order...

There was nothing illegal here at all. This evidence was dumped by a paralegal (potentially by accident it is assumed, but maybe in a last ditch strategy to try to get it all thrown out as privilged due to time limits, which didn't work) before this phase of the trial. The plaintiffs lawyer notified Jones' attorney who only responded with something like "get rid of it" which is not the legal way to go about claiming privilege over individual documents in a 300 gigabyte dump file...

The judge fairly offered Jones's attorney the ability to go through that evidence and cite what specific documents within it were claimed to be privileged.

Jones''s attorney refused, due to there only now being three days left to do that.

But, that specific data, Jones's text messages, had been ordered to be given to the court over a YEAR ago for the trial phase... which Jones didn't do... which is why that portion was summarily judged... leading to this part of the Penalty phase of the trial.

He would have had plenty of time to mark evidence as privileged and retrieve it back after accidental submission if he or Jones had bothered to comply with the court's orders in the first place. But, neither did, so... they found out what happens when one doesn't comply with legal court orders.


I don't know what you're going on about as it is nothing like what you're pretending it is.

Postat inițial de Chunk Norris ☯:

So Alex Jones's attorney's took privileged client conversations and turned them over to the Prosecution, and the judge allowed it.

That right there shows you this is a kangaroo court. Massive...MASSIVE violation of the client/attorney privileges and Alex Lawyer, the prosecutor and the Judge in a fair world, could all face disbarment for using that testimony.

...

Pearl clutch elsewhere - That is not what happened at all.

Jones' attorney did not substantiate any claim of privilege over anything in that dump file.

If he and Jones had complied with multiple court orders demanding that they submit evidence during the discovery process for the trial, then maybe he could have finagled some kind of privilege motion. But, according to law, he would have to have noted what specific parts of this data dump were privileged - He can just claim everything in a file cabinet is privileged just because it's in the file cabinet...

[xDDD]

Anyone who thinks the Alex Jones trial was real and legitimate should pass me some of the popcorn.

He is literally a fake canary in a coal mine.

[Acetyl]

Postat inițial de :D:

Anyone who thinks the Alex Jones trial was real and legitimate should pass me some of the popcorn.

He is literally a fake canary in a coal mine.

But I saw it on TV, how could it not be real???!

[MeowDread]

So we are just forgetting the defamation and lies?

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Postat inițial de dominikrni:

So we are just forgetting the defamation and lies?

People are just sick of the side that constantly lies, and defames people trying to claim that because they decreed it, it must be so.

[Lupa]

Is that the "the water is turning the frickin' frogs gay!!!!" guy?

[Acetyl]

Labyrinth of lies. See how I circle, imaginary lines, imaginary lines.

[Acetyl]

Postat inițial de Lupa:

Is that the "the water is turning the frickin' frogs gay!!!!" guy?

Yes, which refers to agricultural atrazine runoff. Feel free to inform yourself and never repeat that meme again.

[Lupa]

Postat inițial de Acetyl:

Postat inițial de Lupa:

Is that the "the water is turning the frickin' frogs gay!!!!" guy?

Yes, which refers to agricultural atrazine runoff. Feel free to inform yourself and never repeat that meme again.

He was right you know. I used to be a hetero frog until one day BOOM

[MeowDread]

Postat inițial de Acetyl:

Postat inițial de Lupa:

Is that the "the water is turning the frickin' frogs gay!!!!" guy?

Yes, which refers to agricultural atrazine runoff. Feel free to inform yourself and never repeat that meme again.

The frogs are turning the frigging frogs gay!

[Lupa]

Postat inițial de dominikrni:

Postat inițial de Acetyl:

Yes, which refers to agricultural atrazine runoff. Feel free to inform yourself and never repeat that meme again.

The frogs are turning the frigging frogs gay!

Yippee!!!

[xDDD]

Atrazine actually does turn the frogs female. Unfortunately the whole "gay frogs" meme was a misnomer championed by Alex Jones which sadly discredited how pesticides are actually decimating the amphibians.
And frankly it could have implications on humans as well.