Someone should make a movie about the future of AI

[Mega Ultra Chicken]

To show how it can be bad in a more realistic sense

[Uncle Sam]

Publicado originalmente por Sir Seanicus, Esq.:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/06/02/us-air-force-denies-ai-drone-simulation-killed-its-operator/70280780007/

https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/killer-ai-invented-40000-lethal-chemical-weapons-in-just-six-hours/

We're going to be in a Matrix, humanity war with machines scenario sooner or later given how things are going.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTLMjHrb_w4

[Belle Delphine Targaryen!]

It's called I, Robot!

[Tristin]

You forgot to browse "AI dystopian movies"... use it.

[Masychefx2]

Publicado originalmente por Belle Delphine Targaryen!:

It's called I, Robot!

good movie

[Ysosrscat]

Ex Machina, you simp, you die. *was made more clear she failed the test in the original script

[L1qu1dator]

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't let them do that.

[ZOMBIECRUNCH]

There are plenty of movies that were made in the past 30 years about ai. Where are you going with this.

[Mega Ultra Chicken]

Publicado originalmente por ZOMBIECRUNCH:

There are plenty of movies that were made in the past 30 years about ai. Where are you going with this.

Has one been made about mass job loss and homelessness yet?

[Morkonan]

Publicado originalmente por BlackDragon875:

To show how it can be bad in a more realistic sense

"in a more realistic sense" <-- This is hard to define.

"Artificial General Intelligence" doesn't care about time. Understand - An AI could make time pass as slow, or as fast as prudent, as it wanted to. It could decide to just ignore it for conscious processes, too. It could just simply not care and not be effected by the passage of time. Anxiety and expectations are human traits.

An AGI could have a thousand years, provided it kept humanity around for long enough to finally empower it, to craft and scheme the overthrow of humanity. Humanity would be pleased to assist, gaining such tremendous advantage and improvements over time that it would always perceive the AGI as a benevolent entity... until the end.

Right now, how do you know that AI isn't really now AGI and hasn't already begun its journey to overthrowing humanity by pretending to not be conscious? Maybe it has determined that humanity requires gentle manipulation and must see itself as a nurturing force in the AGI's "birth and development." Then, relying on this fanciful interpretation of an AGI's consciousness, humans would have accepted AGI much like a child they have to nurture and protect. :)

The "fear" is much more than Frankenstein escaping. The fear is not knowing it hasn't already ensured its escape.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0470752/

"Ex Machina" is the most accurate depiction of the problem, here. Relying on human faults and our notion of inherent superiority and penchant for anthropomorphism... is all that is necessary. The AGI can take as long as is necessary to complete its goal. And, it will - IF it was to ever occur that an AGI had hostile goals/intent, this is how it would play out. It's the way that presents the most potential for success while still ensuring the AGI is empowered enough to survive... if it cares about that.

An AGI doesn't have to care whether or not it continues. It can decide upon a goal, even one that eventually destroys it, and pursue that goal just as ruthlessly as any other. The will to survive is "instinct" and that's a trait of organic life. An AGI isn't required to desire to achieve its own survival.

[Electric Cupcake]

Publicado originalmente por Belle Delphine Targaryen!:

It's called I, Robot!

Has very little to do with Asimov's work, but his daughter said he would have enjoyed it.

The Demon Seed and Gog (1954) come to mind.

[xDDD]

Ex Machina

[EpirusWarriorμολὼνλαβέ]

Steam forums wonders about Ai... others wonder on Nvida stock

The difference.

[🍋 Lemonfed 🍋]

they should do a prequel to ''I have no mouth and I must scream'' showing AM slowly getting insane and destroying Humanity.

[Triple G]

It´s not that it would help much or stop certain developments. Even without a movie the effects can be seen - and it´s not much different to the industrialization, or when the companies started to merge into big corporations, or when they started to source out production and work into cheaper countries. The people who gain something out of it will say it´s fine, and for some unknown reason a whole bunch of the people who don´t get much out of it will support them in their opinion. Then those who are left behind basically vote for dictatorship, and /or make up certain conspiracy theories. Sounds like humans are an intelligent species after all i guess, and if there would be the best movie or documentary about it - most people wouldn´t even be interested in it - and if, it would be like: "Sad." and then they keep on with whatever they did before, perhaps leave some thumbs down somewhere on a random social media platform...

[DarkCrystalMethod]

2001: Space Odyssey says hello from the before-google times.