Trump might be a president in jail

[Riddley Walker]

I don't want to stir s@it up here (I do) but judging from the polls (he is winning) and judging from his various trials (he is going to jail in at least some of them) there is a real chance.

He could pardon himself on all federal charges but not state charges. I'm not sure how many of those are there. So it could it happen, right?

Imagine a US president sitting in a little improvised office with his red nuke phone, in his jail cell. Javier will take the upper bunk, but Donald could be pres from the lower bunk and host heads of state through that glass barrier with a line phone, and do press briefings during his yard time.

[Ashes-To-Ashes]

If he is incarcerated he would be able be president

[Sherasonni]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Riddley Walker:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Sherasonni:

It might start a cycle of viciously divisive politics, blackmails, arrests, preventing the other side from achieving anything for the country, etc.

I think we are way already in it.

What we've witnessed so far would be tame in comparison to what US politics could become if the arrest happens. Also, if Trump is so guilty, then why didn't they have these trials earlier? Why do it now that he's running for president. It seems so political to me. And they're even going after his children. I doubt that Trump will do nothing about this even if he's in prison. Then what would the Democrats do? Things would continue to escalate.

[=(^ ^)=]

He could have been a good commedian.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR7LHOfSA_k

When is Steam going to fix these utube links.

[Jolly Devil]

Should we start chanting "lock him up"? Those Trumpers seemed to really love that phrase.

[EpirusWarriorμολὼνλαβέ]

He didnt marry enough kids to the tribe


https://www.timesofisrael.com/meet-us-president-elect-joe-bidens-whole-big-jewish-mishpocha/

and wasnt on right kosher party
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jews-in-the-biden-administration
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jews-in-the-barack-obama-administration
https://www.haaretz.com/2008-11-13/ty-article/some-chicago-jews-say-obama-is-actually-the-first-jewish-president/0000017f-f492-d460-afff-fff6d2660000


and messed the investments of the tribe on killary, brining all the plans down and unexpectly interrupting the status qou

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-mega-donors-helped-raise-1-billion-for-hillary-clinton/2016/10/22/a92a0ee2-9603-11e6-bb29-bf2701dbe0a3_story.html

never mess with who the tribe pick as puppet and their kosher party or they will bring the whole systems and tribe pals at every major key position at you


glitch on the matrix cant have that now can we?

[Violeta]

Who cares if trump is a president in jail, when all of congress should be in prison. As well as some former presidents.

They aren't loyal to america, they are loyal to themselves, to their lobbies like Israel and the industrial war complex. They don't serve the american public they look down on it.

And every day they try to think up new ways to take your rights and freedoms away because authoritarians wanna authoritarian.

[Vox]

Remember when the state was meant to serve the public? I don't.

[Xautos]

Opprinnelig skrevet av ⛧:

Who cares if trump is a president in jail, when all of congress should be in prison. As well as some former presidents.

They aren't loyal to america, they are loyal to themselves, to their lobbies like Israel and the industrial war complex. They don't serve the american public they look down on it.

And every day they try to think up new ways to take your rights and freedoms away because authoritarians wanna authoritarian.

Politicians are the same all over the world, it's not like America is special in their department for screw ups.

[shoopy]

He might end up unalived at the rate things are progressing.

[EpirusWarriorμολὼνλαβέ]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Labyrinth:

Remember when the state was meant to serve the public? I don't.

Remember when lobby contribution didnt ever dictate who would not win ?


Remember things ever going against them? Trump is the example what happens when you go against those same forces and contributions. A glitch on the calculated matrix.

The game is rigged and when you go against and figure out a way to brake it you will have the whole casino rushing at you.
The moral of the story. As george Carlin put it
You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls, they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying, to get what they want.

Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I'll tell you what they don’t want: They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking.They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. Thats against their interests.

Thats right. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting ♥♥♥♥♥♥ by a system that threw them overboard 30 ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient brainwashed tools that will allow all that.

[Stranger]

Nobody here seems to understand even the basics of the American political system, so I'll lay it out plainly.

He can just order the military to break him out; state prisons have no authority to hold federal officers if the feds tell them not to, and if they refuse that's basically an act of secession.

So he has legitimate cause, first of all.

Second, the military has a responsiblity to break him out anyway. He's the commander in chief; they can refuse and recuse themselves from command, temporarily, and somebody somewhere will do it.

Finally, if they refuse the most powerful military on the planet right now offically has no government backing, and isn't responsible to any government force.

Either they let him out when he becomes president or there's a civil war, and the military gets to break apart and choose who they back.

[Jolly Devil]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Stranger:

Nobody here seems to understand even the basics of the American political system, so I'll lay it out plainly.

He can just order the military to break him out; state prisons have no authority to hold federal officers if the feds tell them not to, and if they refuse that's basically an act of secession.

So he has legitimate cause, first of all.

Second, the military has a responsiblity to break him out anyway. He's the commander in chief; they can refuse and recuse themselves from command, temporarily, and somebody somewhere will do it.

Finally, if they refuse the most powerful military on the planet right now offically has no government backing, and isn't responsible to any government force.

Either they let him out when he becomes president or there's a civil war, and the military gets to break apart and choose who they back.

Gotta love the sheer confidence this person has to be like, y'all don't know ♥♥♥♥, then proceeds to talk about the most stupid scenario that would never happen. Ain't no one dying for Trump bro. The dude wouldn't even piss on you if you were on fire

[Xautos]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Stranger:

Nobody here seems to understand even the basics of the American political system, so I'll lay it out plainly.

He can just order the military to break him out; state prisons have no authority to hold federal officers if the feds tell them not to, and if they refuse that's basically an act of secession.

So he has legitimate cause, first of all.

Second, the military has a responsiblity to break him out anyway. He's the commander in chief; they can refuse and recuse themselves from command, temporarily, and somebody somewhere will do it.

Finally, if they refuse the most powerful military on the planet right now offically has no government backing, and isn't responsible to any government force.

Either they let him out when he becomes president or there's a civil war, and the military gets to break apart and choose who they back.

Funnily enough i already knew this and posted about some of it earlier. what's with this presumption no one outside the US can understand a political system or types of thinking? that's just plain nonsense.

American politics aren't that much different from that in the UK or any other democratic country. it's not hard to understand with a little research.

[Stranger]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Jolly Devil:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Stranger:

Nobody here seems to understand even the basics of the American political system, so I'll lay it out plainly.

He can just order the military to break him out; state prisons have no authority to hold federal officers if the feds tell them not to, and if they refuse that's basically an act of secession.

So he has legitimate cause, first of all.

Second, the military has a responsiblity to break him out anyway. He's the commander in chief; they can refuse and recuse themselves from command, temporarily, and somebody somewhere will do it.

Finally, if they refuse the most powerful military on the planet right now offically has no government backing, and isn't responsible to any government force.

Either they let him out when he becomes president or there's a civil war, and the military gets to break apart and choose who they back.

Gotta love the sheer confidence this person has to be like, y'all don't know ♥♥♥♥, then proceeds to talk about the most stupid scenario that would never happen. Ain't no one dying for Trump bro. The dude wouldn't even piss on you if you were on fire

Either they do it or they're answerable to nobody.

The crown can't just step in and take control; there's a clearly defined separation of powers. He's the only one who can actually command the military to do anything.

If he gets elected, they can't hold him anymore. Many many precedents proving this.

And if they don't respect those precedents he's literally obligated to mobilize the military to break him out.

Opprinnelig skrevet av Xautos:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Stranger:

Nobody here seems to understand even the basics of the American political system, so I'll lay it out plainly.

He can just order the military to break him out; state prisons have no authority to hold federal officers if the feds tell them not to, and if they refuse that's basically an act of secession.

So he has legitimate cause, first of all.

Second, the military has a responsiblity to break him out anyway. He's the commander in chief; they can refuse and recuse themselves from command, temporarily, and somebody somewhere will do it.

Finally, if they refuse the most powerful military on the planet right now offically has no government backing, and isn't responsible to any government force.

Either they let him out when he becomes president or there's a civil war, and the military gets to break apart and choose who they back.

Funnily enough i already knew this and posted about some of it earlier. what's with this presumption no one outside the US can understand a political system or types of thinking? that's just plain nonsense.

American politics aren't that much different from that in the UK or any other democratic country. it's not hard to understand with a little research.

I actually just posted something inflammatory to get attention. Everyone here does it.

They're also massively different systems since one is just a puppet for the crown and uses crown intersts as fill when anything inconvenient happens.

[aka]

Trump will not only be president, but I believe he will go down in world history as the greatests leader on earth since King David.

Wow it's pretty amazing

You are welcome