Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Правила обсуждений
Пожаловаться
I do strongly agree that, as a consumer, the ability of an entertainment product developer to get our money before we can figure out if the product is worthwhile entertainment or not... is being widely abused in gaming and some other media.
It is the model we're "used to," though, and so are the developers and publishers.
Donation-based systems have shown to have some greater returns for entertainment producers, but it's difficult to budget for that if one has a large studio.
If Steam had a "Donation Based" "Pay" button for a game, would you pay more than the common asking price if you liked it?
Of Note:
There are mods in the Steam Workshop that use Donation processors, like "cupofcoffee" or some such, as a way for those who like the mod to donate to the creator. Have you or would you use that to pay for an otherwise "free" mod?
Also: Some devs incorporate charity/donation models. For instance, the developer of KeeperRL will give a key to those who donate to a Wildlife charity:
https://steamcommunity.com/app/329970/discussions/0/1470841629666482168/?l=italian
(PS - No, I'm not Italian. :))
Actually never mind I can.
If I like something I can see, I will buy it. But there is just too much trash to sort through to pay to watch it.... I can just buy what I like and want to see again.
Well I shouldn't say trash. One persons trash is another's gold. That is what makes it good in that they take chances on stories but not all of them are for everyone. Typical entertainment industry here tries to make everything bland to appeal to "everyone" .
The GoFundMe Trump Wall donations where even skimmed off the top into a family bank account, in which Trump pardoned that scammer without question, yet not your US Capital rioters.
Trump was ordered to pay 8 separate charities $250000 each, after attempting to scam them too.
A millionaire sued Trump over the mishandling of Trump PAC donations for the US election recount. Only 12% of those donations went towards the actual recount, the small print claimed donations under the value of $500 can be used for other unrelated things. Ended up going towards TrumpJR's Manison, Trump's Scotland Golf Course and even his son's wives.
Eric Trump funneled cancer charity donation money to his own businesses and golfing too. Donations who believed the money was going to St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, never reached there, skimmed off the top and tax evaded - $230,080 in 2013 and to $242,294 in 2014.
The Trump family is pretty much banned from charities.
Donations are only as good as the service you are offering it.
Admittedly the story does suffer for the most part ... but a lot of times things are dropped I wouldn't want to see anyway. It's a trade off but to me the anime adds more than it loses in most cases. If it even came from a manga. Some are studio original productions.
They don't want to spend millions in ads upon a toxic bunch of immature racist and transphobic adults, upon a now unsafe for children due to removing trust, transparency and safety, breaking the EU advertising laws... for a child or family friendly product. In no way is that blackmail not paying for your crappy not even targeted anymore audience service... *cough* Elon Musk *cough*. Rather an advertiser must be extremely stupid to waste it's own money upon that and get less in return than they could elsewhere at a cheaper price tag too.
Say you are Disney, for example... Your target audience would be that of parents, teens and young children. You would get more of that target audience from platforms such as TikTok, than you would upon xTwitter which is now even rejecting that audience and making it unsafe for them. Then to have that even displayed upon an area in which your target audience would avoid and still expect you to fork out a ton of money to do so, you might as well rolled up $100 dollar notes and smoke them instead. It would cheaper and more effective.
It's like having a homeless guy at the street lights offer to wash your car window with dirty water and mark streaks all over it, then attempt to curse you out and yell that you are trying to blackmail them for not giving their poor service a coin and instead driving to a car wash to clean up their own mess. A sane logical person would assume that individual is mentally ill and just on drugs, whatever the case, clearly not a self-titled billionaire with a narcissistic ego.