Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
There are fewer and fewer living forums nowadays. Thankfully cars forums seem to be going strong, but many others have fallen and, even in the rare case where the first page isn't AI-generated articles, we get some moron's opinion on reddit with a few other people circle jerking that opinion.
Valve didn't give notice that they were shutting down the old SPUF and until people complained, Valve turned the servers back on for about 3 weeks to let people archive what they could before Valve completely shut it down for good...
https://na.alienwarearena.com/ucf/show/1614523/boards/gaming-news/News/spuf-shut-down-valve-gives-us-a-lesson-how-to-alienate-your-most-loyal-users
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/1/2741975115083672977/
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/7/2333276539600694752/
https://steamcommunity.com/groups/TheDailySPUF
A big mess.
It can be said that the information that is on the Internet in this decentralized state, simply smaller websites cannot survive long. There are many good examples even from large companies that no matter how good they are at what they do, something bad happens.
Probably Web 3.0 and good old P2P file sharing technology are the ways to keep these services online.
So besides organizing group of average citizens to preserve knowledge. maybe bringing the topic to local govt / local library might be a good conversation to have, even if it isn't in the current overton window.
Car forums really depend on the manufacturer and model lines. If they have a cult following, their forums are evergreens. For example, stuff like Golf and Transporter forums seem to never grow old.
And well, Reddit is a content delivery system disguised as a forum after all. I'm not gonna say it's totally useless, but it's not adequate as a knowledge base either.
What I find rather weird, they shut down the SPUF only to replace it with another similar forum.
This one.
At least it's archived.
They replaced it in 2012 but left SPUF until 2017. I get it but the way they did it was very poorly thought out.
Yeah I mean I ~have~ learned good things from reddit, but more often than not it's full of self-righteous losers who love the smell of their own farts.
Still think you're on the right side of history?
Particularly not to organisations with an agenda. Just imagine what a knowledge base ML algorithms could be if we would just feed it with unfiltered, uncensored and unregulated data.
Such an algorithm wouldn't be a fluffy corporate pet, but a workhorse for the people to cease the means of digital production.
Guess who doesn't want that to happen.
The corpo-govs want us to be good little consoomers.
Yes, I haven't used it, but it appears to be basically the same thing. What could've stopped them to just migrate the vBulletin system to their own? Probably just shedding what they considered dead weight.
One of Reddit main issues (besides not being a real forum and the stereotypical Reddit user being under the influence of content delivery systems), is that old threads get locked after a while, so you have to start a new one, even if you just have an additional question or even some knowledge to add. Also, for some reason, older threads are oftentimes Swiss cheese because users and all their posts get deleted often for reason unrelated to the topic.
This is the great problem hitting many search engines and I've noticed it as well. The incentive to run a search engine is money and pushing the definition of "relevant" to someone's desired search is often very influenced by that engine's owner.
There's also the increasing problem of "static" that gets heavily multiplied by marketing efforts the engine may not even be a part of. As time progresses and more unrelated topics crop up, all heavily promoted by third-party interests, the static gets louder.
The other day I was searching for some obscure thing and, unfortunately, it seems there was a recent movie with that name... I can't even remember what it was I was searching for, but ALL I could get was crap about that darn movie. I tried filtering - It didn't do diddly and my search results were still a bunch of movie crap.
Be a 'net vet, I was eventually able to squelch most of the static. But, the tools that I was provided by the various engines sucked at doing what they were supposed to do... I had to enter into verbose mode just to craft a search string that was still meaningful while barely being able to give me the needed results.
This has happened with increasing frequency through the last few years.
And, IMO, this could be something "AI" could help with. "Could." The worry there is that engines will only be motivated by it to steer users where they want them to go.
Every site that pushes info to a user in an attempt to influence their behavior is running into this problem as content increases.
Go ahead - Search for "Skateboarding" videos or some crap on Youtube and the rest of your session and, perhaps, whatever meta youtube has assigned you to regardless of whether you close your browser or not, will force-feed you "skateboarding" videos all darn day... Click on one and there will be an endless repetition of crappy skateboard vids no matter if you're researching rocket-science or not. AND, if you do look up "Rocket Science" a host of UFO-Wingnut vids will happily accompany the rest of your feed.
Unless there's some regulatory, enforceable, standards set that prohibits it, AI will be used to the same purpose. That's a bit frightening.
(What 3D site/forum was shut down?)
This is exactly why the Web Archive exists - To preserve otherwise empty bits of potentially valuable, historical, information.
The problem is well-known and is considered to be very serious, so many governments are working to preserve "data." This is going to be a necessity as the money pushes both creators and publishers/hosts into the digital realm where decades of knowledge can be completely erased by one keystroke...
Just saying - It is acknowledged by The Powers That Be as a serious problem and there is some effort to do something about it, some by sites like Wayback Machine/etc. Others, by journals forcing print-copies and physical archiving and the like. These days, a piece of appropriate paper, properly stored, could last more than a lot of digital storage media. (Wide variety, there, and improvements have been made in some digital storage media)
It's a "service." Someone there is making money for hosting it. When THEY decide, they can remove it with a keystroke. Several large companies have made bids for it because of its social presence and the varied connections it has with its userbase.
But, no matter how much interaction there is valuable, it can all be erased - It is as impermanent as the rest of The Internet and that is exactly what the very real problem is.
So, when Discord disappears in a few years or gets wiped and its userbase is move, outside of their control, to a more insulated product that can more easily trap them in a web of consumption... then what?
The "internet" was never about "truth" just as it was never constructed for privacy - It's about facilitating the exchange of communications.
Just some random info-links fed to me by Google when I used my badly-formed search terms... Just reassuring you that others do recognize the problem:
https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2018/01/preserving-future-one-bit-time/
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/21/opinion/digital-archives-memory.html
https://techcrunch.com/2015/08/27/the-internet-is-failing-the-website-preservation-test/
In a hilarious bit of irony, the Techcrunch article about preserving "teh interents" is 404'd : https://loc.gov/preservation/about/mission.html
it is to lol
Can we have a ... oh... look.. a TL;DR, thanks OP
The only thing worse then too little information... is too much information...
The Internet was never about "seeking the truth" ( whatever that is ) it was always about just passing information along quickly and efficiently in small amounts between two parties.
Unfortunately information has outpaced it's own usefulness... there's such a quest for information but of only one's interests and bias that anything otherwise is deemed "useless"
But that's not the "corporate" or "government interests" fault... as more the people inquiring and interested in meaningless content delivery...
People care more about a certain celebrity's hot-take on a current political / social issue... then if important and useful information gets stored and saved for future generations education.
TL;DR
The Internet stopped being a tool of information and turned into a entertainment IV drip a long, long time ago... it's a shame really, but that's nobody's fault but who's using it, like everything else it's only as good as it's useful for.
They can even tell you places don't exist that still do if they don't think you are "allowed" to go there.
Google became useless for general information a few years ago and it has been getting steadily worse. Other search engines can help a little.. but basically get an overlay that hijacks results.
Forums are more social than social media: Change my mind!