Books Shouldn't Be Censored

[RealEgg]

Title

[Swarmfly]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Fajita Jim:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Zubovnikov:

Obvious smut is the exception, I dare say.

What's wrong with obvious smut?

It's disgusting, and bad for plants.

[Fajita Jim]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Zubovnikov:

It's disgusting, and bad for plants.

Some people are all about that exhibition. Different strokes for different folks is a sexual reference, you know.

[Thisha]

Censorship is becoming ridiculous.

Street names are being changed, TV series episodes being removed, words are being changed...

Politicians and other people deciding such things are being caught themselves for all kinds of wrong.

And here in Belgium for example can our royalty just keep on doing what they do while they are a big example of wrong:, being able to still pass status, privileges and wealth over the bloodline just because someone took power once.
If something should not be of this era anymore...

If one is so stupid of thinking that making something disappear will make things better... Then they shouldn't cast out the news, block as good as every movie, forbid hell of a lot of songs, forbid a lot of sports...

I don't think if for example rapes would stop if we made the concept disappear and never spoke of it again.

It's all about education, context, thinking for yourself, building towards a decent society...

But I guess sticking our heads into the ground is just much easier.

[RustledJimm]

Opprinnelig skrevet av jok tran:

Opprinnelig skrevet av RustledJimm:

The government should not ban art of any kind.

As a respectful loli appreciator I highly agree.

I've changed my position.

Loli art shouldn't be banned outright but everyone who enjoys loli art and makes it should receive psychiatric help

[Morkonan]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Thisha:

Censorship is becoming ridiculous.

I agree. But...

Street names are being changed, TV series episodes being removed, words are being changed...

Revisionism. They're not removing them, they're changing them to what they want them to say/mean.

Politicians and other people deciding such things are being caught themselves for all kinds of wrong.

They obey the mob and if they can get what the mob can give them, power, they'll agree to anything.

And here in Belgium for example can our royalty just keep on doing what they do while they are a big example of wrong:, being able to still pass status, privileges and wealth over the bloodline just because someone took power once.
If something should not be of this era anymore...

If one is so stupid of thinking that making something disappear will make things better... Then they shouldn't cast out the news, block as good as every movie, forbid hell of a lot of songs, forbid a lot of sports...

I don't think if for example rapes would stop if we made the concept disappear and never spoke of it again.

It's all about education, context, thinking for yourself, building towards a decent society...

But I guess sticking our heads into the ground is just much easier.

No matter if it's a dictatorship, a monarchy, or a representative republic, the few always only govern by the consent of the many. "The Many" always have the choice and the true power to make change happen.

So... do that?

[RustledJimm]

Opprinnelig skrevet av VCR86:

Opprinnelig skrevet av RustledJimm:

I've changed my position.

Loli art shouldn't be banned outright but everyone who enjoys loli art and makes it should receive psychiatric help

For the completely fictional content that somebody consumes?

Yes

[Q-T_3.14.exe]

Opprinnelig skrevet av SlowMango:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Alby:

though i agree with most of your post, all books are not art lulz

They are.

There is a clear difference between books of artistic literature and books that have information and studies and books with some certain topics. Still no book should be destroyed, banned or censored. Knowledge is power. Don't agree with a book? Put it back on the shelf respectfully.

[Birds]

Opprinnelig skrevet av VCR86:

In my opinion, I don't think anything should be censored or banned unless it's ACTUAL illegal ♥♥♥♥.

You mean like calling God a moron

[Xero_Daxter]

Opprinnelig skrevet av RustledJimm:

Opprinnelig skrevet av jok tran:

As a respectful loli appreciator I highly agree.

I've changed my position.

Loli art shouldn't be banned outright but everyone who enjoys loli art and makes it should receive psychiatric help

You switched up very fast. Lmfaooooooo.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Birds:

Opprinnelig skrevet av VCR86:

In my opinion, I don't think anything should be censored or banned unless it's ACTUAL illegal ♥♥♥♥.

You mean like calling God a moron

That isn't illegal.

[Not Big Surprise]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Rivers:

Wanting no censorship and not wanting your values to be the dominating is a philosophy for the weak, the pushovers.

When one side fights for censorship and the other fights for none, the side that supports censorship always wins. The only way to win is to fight fire with fire but may those with the superior values and whom are not corrupted by degeneracy be the ones who wield the power.

how do you know your values are superior

Opprinnelig skrevet av jok tran:

Opprinnelig skrevet av RustledJimm:

The government should not ban art of any kind.

As a respectful loli appreciator I highly agree.

stay away from children

[RealEgg]

Opprinnelig skrevet av The Decadent:

Opprinnelig skrevet av crunchyfrog:

Why do so many of these people bring up things that literally don't exist?

How far down silliness have we gone that they don't ever even check up to see if it's correct? It speaks volumes about their laziness and dishonesty.

What I find amusing is that I saw the other day that all books that have been banned in certain places thus far have had their sales skyrocket.

It's almost like not only are they lying but they're wrong too ;)

If they omitted placing 50 shades of labias and the Enchiridion of ♥♥♥♥ on the front shelf (in the children's section) at your local library, consider yourself blessed.

Ok, that isn't happening at all, also, there's such a thing called age restrictions, ever heard of them?

[Phénomènes Mystiques]

The banning of "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "Of Mice and Men" is just plain stupid.

[RealEgg]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Wynters:

The banning of "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "Of Mice and Men" is just plain stupid.

Banning of any books are stupid.

[RealEgg]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Sir Dookface McFerretballs:

I'd rather have no book censorship than "some" censorship.

The problem ALWAYS arises with WHO gets to CHOOSE what is censored or not.

If you wanna slap a warning sticker on some "questionable material", fine.

Ultimately if someone doesn't want to read something then they shouldn't read it, not go out of their way to make sure others can't read it.

Individuals should ultimately be the ones to decide if they want to read something or not, not the government or corporations or boards of "concerned people". :marten_sip:

The warning sticker method is a good method, it doesn't remove anything and just says that it is inappropriate.