Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
legit who made these nominations are not real gamers.
Steam Awards are a joke too. So much so, people just pick random crap just to get the Nomination badge and the winners to get free cards.
People were expecting Bully: Hogwarts Edition
But instead they gave us Far Cry: Hogwarts
1. Being popular has never made anything good. It can, at times, be a good sign. But more than anything, what it means is that it was marketed effectively.
2. If it's the most popular game of the year, everyone has already heard of it. So you're not even getting introduced to new stuff you might have missed.
3. It's so far removed from any rational motive for gaming in the first place. It's not even a contest of really good players. It's a contest of the people who make the games. It would be like millions of athletes tuning in for a "best stadium" contest. Now, I have no doubt that they do that but still.
Why waste the dev money on the sound? Just have it be a white screen and call it "Zelda"?
I have changed votes before as I knew a certain niche game could never win anyway.