Why does the "woke" culture bother so many people?

[Franklin]

What's wrong with the "woke" culture?

[Locke]

Titus původně napsal:

Bomb Shot původně napsal:

Racism is the white against black.
Woke is the black against white.
Anti woke is the white against black pay back.

Why against each other in the first place. Pointless battle?

The only people who define it this way are anti-woke people. The rest of the world defines racism as prejudice and discrimination against a person because of their membership in a racial or ethnic group, typically a group that is a minority.

Typically doesn't mean always. So if you see "black against white," which I presume means a black person using prejudice or discrimination against a white person, then you would still be seeing racism.

Meaningless at this point, if Star Wars isn't 100% black gay midgets its racist sexist and ablist, its just made up gobbledygok as one can easily make the case the woke are exactly all things they claim they are against.

They just think they are entitled to revenge.

And frankly the only people who use the term antiwoke with a straight face are the woke.

[Titus]

lankaras původně napsal:

Titus původně napsal:

It is anti-woke parents who are overly authoritarian and involved in their child's school and life, they should also be overly involved in their child's internet and media usage.

That is a weird sideways argument, I didn't say that they got it from the internet. And authoritarians are exactly the opposite; they trust schools just like they trust the government.

Here read this for why I chose the word authoritarian: https://www.parentingforbrain.com/authoritative-vs-authoritarian-parenting/
And no, an authoritarian parent would not trust schools, they think they should be the ones who have a say in everything their child is learning in school.

[Bomb Shot]

Titus původně napsal:

Bomb Shot původně napsal:

Racism is the white against black.
Woke is the black against white.
Anti woke is the white against black pay back.

Why against each other in the first place. Pointless battle?

The only people who define it this way are anti-woke people. The rest of the world defines racism as prejudice and discrimination against a person because of their membership in a racial or ethnic group, typically a group that is a minority.

Typically doesn't mean always. So if you see "black against white," which I presume means a black person using prejudice or discrimination against a white person, then you would still be seeing racism.

So they're all racism. So they just don't have to be racist to each other right?

[Titus]

apathy původně napsal:

Its really bothering Disney's profit margins.

Perhaps they should stop doing it?

It would hurt their profit margins more to reverse course.

[Titus]

Locke původně napsal:

Titus původně napsal:

It is anti-woke parents who are overly authoritarian and involved in their child's school and life, they should also be overly involved in their child's internet and media usage.

Ah yes, being against teachers abusing institutional power to push perversion is being "authoritarian".

As if parents had no rights over how their children should be raised.

Teachers don't have enough time in their day to be pushing an agenda.

[GloriousZote]

Plaid původně napsal:

lankaras původně napsal:

Indeed, they have no problem with openly saying things like "white cishet male", which is racist, heterophobic and sexist all at the same time.

Are you actually offended by that?

Irrelevant, they're crying about all these -isms, but they're more -ist than anyone else.

[Rio]

Wokism, would have attacked any male group that was the majority in america at the time, if another group had been the majority. The whole privileged thing is all about that, you have the power and we do not. And you have empathy and care that we call you bad names, and give into our demands.

Wokism is, give us things for existing, because your strong and we aren't. And eventually they get the all the power and you get north korea with it top family, or china with mao, or soviet russia. Unless someone puts a stop to it, but usually no one does, because free money via welfare.

Like all this talk these days of lands paying people that were conquered. Is another example of pay us, because you were strong. Like Australia. Someone is always a victim of strength, of moral wrong like Canada.

You took my people from a placeeee... now pay me because you were strong.🎶 Now sing alooonnng

[GloriousZote]

Titus původně napsal:

Locke původně napsal:

Ah yes, being against teachers abusing institutional power to push perversion is being "authoritarian".

As if parents had no rights over how their children should be raised.

Teachers don't have enough time in their day to be pushing an agenda.

They'll make room for it by doing this instead of teaching the subject they're supposed to teach.

[Titus]

GloriousZote původně napsal:

Titus původně napsal:

The only people who define it this way are anti-woke people. The rest of the world defines racism as prejudice and discrimination against a person because of their membership in a racial or ethnic group, typically a group that is a minority.

Typically doesn't mean always. So if you see "black against white," which I presume means a black person using prejudice or discrimination against a white person, then you would still be seeing racism.

The woke came up with the term "reverse racism" and then say its not racist.

Wikipedia says "The concept is often associated with conservative social movements" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_racism

[Titus]

Psycho původně napsal:

i think just the word Woke alone annoys a lot of people

It doesn't describe enough of someone's goals or intentions. It leads people to make a lot of assumptions based on whether someone is "woke" or "anti-woke." Therefore I dislike the terminology.

[Locke]

Titus původně napsal:

⛧ původně napsal:

Wokism did tell people not to have kids.

Prioritize career instead of kids until later life (When it may be too late)

Have fewer kids, because think of the planet,

And now america is under replacement levels.

The only people who care about "replacement" levels are people who want exponential economic growth from exponential population growth. However, you can have economic growth despite a stagnate population.

Or this person may complain about there not being enough young people because it will disproportionately result in a more aged population that is more expensive to care for and will need more funding into healthcare, something conservatives are against.

Ah yes, the people who were endlessly going on about animal extinction not long ago have gone silent on it as it no longer conforms to their modern nihilism of "why do you care".

Its a contradiction of the leftist, tactical nihilism, its predictable because if you point out everything they are so concerned about is undermined by their fight against reproduction they will flip into exactly that, tactical nihilism rendering all their concerns moot.

None of your causes matter past a generation, in fact your rainbow is filtering out because they are no longer encouraged to conform to norms. The people who will most thoughtlessly breed will not have the inclination or ability to finish your eco projects to save the world or whatever else you will claim to believe in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQfJmHmJopo

Every girl boss who doesn't have children ensures her genes makes up less of the future, you can only ensure the opposite of all you likely believe in.

Also, replacement rate isn't "exponential growth". You know what words mean right? Its understood to mean just to keep the population stable, and you are well below that, and likely the people who most think like you are through the floor.

[Titus]

lankaras původně napsal:

GloriousZote původně napsal:

The woke came up with the term "reverse racism" and then say its not racist.

Indeed, they have no problem with openly saying things like "white cishet male", which is racist, heterophobic and sexist all at the same time.

By no means is an objective term discriminatory. So it is not racist, "heterophobic", or sexist.

[Locke]

Titus původně napsal:

Locke původně napsal:

Ah yes, being against teachers abusing institutional power to push perversion is being "authoritarian".

As if parents had no rights over how their children should be raised.

Teachers don't have enough time in their day to be pushing an agenda.

You don't know what HBD is let alone TDS but suddenly you know all about teaching curriculum's.

Tactical hatchling.

You know very well schools spend more and more of their time on nonsense, and the activists are down right rabid with their indoctrination.

Its no secret, they post it themselves.
https://twitter.com/search?q=from%3Alibsoftiktok%20teacher&src=typed_query&f=live

[Titus]

Locke původně napsal:

Titus původně napsal:

The only people who define it this way are anti-woke people. The rest of the world defines racism as prejudice and discrimination against a person because of their membership in a racial or ethnic group, typically a group that is a minority.

Typically doesn't mean always. So if you see "black against white," which I presume means a black person using prejudice or discrimination against a white person, then you would still be seeing racism.

Meaningless at this point, if Star Wars isn't 100% black gay midgets its racist sexist and ablist, its just made up gobbledygok as one can easily make the case the woke are exactly all things they claim they are against.

They just think they are entitled to revenge.

And frankly the only people who use the term antiwoke with a straight face are the woke.

I never said that such a thing wouldn't be wrong, but I can say that such a thing does not exist. At this point you are being hyperbolic which is distancing your argument from reality.

[Titus]

Bomb Shot původně napsal:

Titus původně napsal:

The only people who define it this way are anti-woke people. The rest of the world defines racism as prejudice and discrimination against a person because of their membership in a racial or ethnic group, typically a group that is a minority.

Typically doesn't mean always. So if you see "black against white," which I presume means a black person using prejudice or discrimination against a white person, then you would still be seeing racism.

So they're all racism. So they just don't have to be racist to each other right?

No one should be racist to any group.