Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
It is not logic nor obvious. If you can't prove the existence of something, that does not mean that it is not there. You ASSUME that it is not there. Reasoning like this, you are going to say that radio waves obviously do not exist when you have no device to measure them.
And what is even less logical is this psychobabble about "they need something to believe in" and so on. It is baseless and it shows that you are not being rational. You are being emotional because you can't deal with these things.
For something to be considered possible we must first achieve it. And as far as reality is concerned we have to yet to even remotely design anything close.
AI is far more limited than you think for example.
You also can't just "scan" a brain and somehow that result in copying someone.
All of these ideas stem from fantasy, come back to reality.
Already did, i even figured out that a gholem is an Geometric Holographic Object Luminated from an External Module
Oh and what does someone do when their pc is hacked? A full delete and reinstall of the SSD/Hard Drive.
But that's the problem you're ignoring, we don't even know exactly how any of this stuff 'could' work.
We also don't know the limitations of said technology, we're basing everything on current tech and baseless predictions that rarely reflect reality.
Once you step back and read into what science has actually been proving or not. You realize how such a thing is silly and probably impossible in the way that scifi tells us it is.
einstein says the universe would have to be the harddrive as well as the computer, and that they'd be physically inseparable from the simulation itself.
ie particles simulate reality.
People used to say all sorts of funny things, such as only needing so much system storage ever.
Hence the great reset, aka nelson mandela effect.
Umm what? You are talking about the "Ultra VR simulator"? I was not talking about that, this is about "something which we can't see/prove".
People can say a lot of things, just because it was from *insert famous person* doesn't mean it's worth acknowledging beyond their own personal beliefs.
Especially since nothing has ever come of it, people also thought our tech would be far different in our day than it actually is.
He died in 73 or 77, so yes personal word processors were becoming normalized in high tech fields. The internet was developing in the university systems, and trollbots were already being written and unwittingly interacted with. It was essentially 'modern,' just not as large-scale as mass media phenomenons like UseNet would be. Or Twitter or forums or w/e which are still just the same thing, but with more people.
Our current understanding of particle information theory is that each and every particle has enough potential information states to store the entire universe on it.
nobody believes anything except what important famous people have told them to believe. that's the nature of society. you don't go around believing we live in a sim as a part of an argument with a rogue ai we were trying to escape do you?
idk tesla's vision of the internet was pretty accurate. I think he knew he was being willfully optimistic about it too.