安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
genetics. our genepool will diminish and erode over time with unabated incest.
we have to have a law that protects us from this as people will sex anything it seems.
to me it's simple: no kids, no animals, no dead people, no family. if it's 28 years old+ and not related in any way it's ok to flirt. and of course draws breath.
remain?
at the moment incest is not a crime.
it is legal in our current law.
the obny restruction our law had is that you cannot marry if 2d degree ir closer related.
but 3d degree aka cousins can marry
we can debate if this is as the law should remain but if a dad and daughter or brother and sister wish to go funky.m it us not againtbthe law provided they are of age of consent
*U looked into our code of law but you cannot be recognised as father either if not alllowed to marry.
should a brother and sister get a chilf together she will be registered as mother and the father will be listed as unknown.
So what about if it’s ok if no making kids, no making families. Just love and sex are fine?
remain for the places on Earth that is a crime.
be a crime for the places on Earth that is not.
here it is forbidden and prosecuted as well the marriage of two people who are very closely related (brother/sister or father/daughter-mother/son) not the actual intercourse between the two.
the intercourse is a taboo and it is frowned upon heavily by our societal standards.
the only reason i present to this is the genetic risk we take should we allow incest scot-free.
despite age of consent. yes say both parties are of age of consent. it must still be outlawed.
accidents will happen. kids will be made. no i can't say that "just" love and "just" sex are fine either. it's family. i don't think it should be legal to love family in that way and the only reason i provide is to make sure that no accidents will occur. we have to have a law for this.
Why do you want to control sex and love life of others?
i don't have a need to control the love life of others. i just don't want to see our collective genepool go down the drain via unabated incest. to make sure that this doesn't happen we need a law that forbids it. the only reason i present to this is the genetic factor and none other.
obviously not. the law cannot exercise prejudice. it must cover everyone.
“Our”? I’m not part of “your”. Should it be my body and my gene?