安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Quite a scary prospect for everyone with a mental disability living in the UK. Imagine smashing something during a breakdown or out of sheer stupity: "Indefinite hospital order"!!
Exactly!
Was probably easier to just have him rot. But who knows, maybe that's GCHQ's normal recruitment tactics for such cases, in which case I'm not surprised they have to rely on the NSA that much. Not that the BND would be much be much better at this. ;P
I think you have a overly positive outlook on this situation and missed what the prison asylums are for. Forensic psychiatries might be everything, but they are definitely not for rehabilitation - not in the positive sense anyway. He's now at the wimps of someone who has absolutely no issue drugging people against their will with drugs that cause lasting damage, just to make them shut up. A fair bunch of people working in these prison asylums are little Mengeles.
It's fair do call an "indefinite hospital order" a life sentence, given the implications and indefinite nature. Everything else is just false hopes.
Projecting someone else's situation on this situation is also not gonna fly with me either.
I agree on the rest though.
That being the most positive outcome is quite sickening still.
Well, if you don't believe in their rehabilitation purpose then it's harsh only in your mind. I don't see anything wrong putting mentally ill guy in an asylum, which is what the court think he is.
For me, asylum is not equal to death sentence, so it's not harsher than sending him to prison. I don't even believe they are as bad as you think they are. Not that I have any experience myself though.
They must have some kind of evidence that show signs of mental illness to send him there. I don't believe Rockstar or any other corps would even consider bribery or do anything just to kill the guy. Not really worth the effort.
You're just arguing that the real issue is that he's a criminal, and the courts are infalliably just in putting him there. And like, "no harm done lololol" basically.
Did you even read what he wrote, or are you just substituting your own explanation as a response apropos of the vague topic he's typing?
The "evidence" of mental illness they seem to have is his diagnosis with autism, which isn't a curable illness, but a disability you are born with and have for life. The desire to be a career criminal isn't a mental illness, else they'd have to lock up at least half of Parliament.
It's clearly an excuse to throw him in the oubliette, else they'd give him due process and a prospect of rehabilitation.
Again, not having an issue that he gets sentenced, just the circumstances, implications and relative scope of the sentence.
- A smart mouth, insufferable criminal that openly admit that He will commit crime again, given the chance.
- Already read it before typing first comment, but given my limited intelligence, and very different moral standards compare to most people here, I may have post stupid opinion. I'll try to limit myself to a more simple matters next time.
That unfortunately seems plausible.
Not just the US it's a global industry...
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2022-11-05/inside-the-global-hack-for-hire-industry
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/kpmg-big-companies-should-hire-hackers
https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/growth-of-hackers-for-hire-will-lead-to-more-attacks-and-unpredictable-threats-uk-cyber-security-agency-warns-12861182
https://www.enisa.europa.eu/news/enisa-news/hackers-for-hire-drive-the-evolution-of-the-new-enisa-threat-landscape
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/26/technology/china-hackers.html
If they meant that he'd be in a real prison, not an asylum for royals and bastards who are Too Important to face real punishment in the first place, and instead need to be psychologically tortured until they fall in line.
usually because they weren't even the people actually responsible it's an utlimately pointless exercise in blame shifting and authoritarian reprogramming for victims of the establishment.
you can pretend to be dumb if you want.
how hard do you think it is to coach an autist to incriminate themselves, if they think it's for the best?
If you take the first deal you get to keep your voting rights, nominally.
If you're a hump for your mandatory service period they economically discriminate against you to draw you back into working for them.
Hackers can't usually pass drug tests so the FBI works with intermediary companies who are responsible for them, and also not officially a part of the law enforcement establishment save through extremely vague deputization of the hackers themselves so that they have legal permission to do their work.
More often than not they wind up administrating pedo honeypots, which the FBI spits out like candy for SOME REASON.
Went to college with someone who wound up working for one of those intermediary companies in management.
Mostly statements from hackers themselves, as relayed through various news outlets.
I don't have the articles on hand, and the hackers I'm thinking of were anonymous.
If you want to overfocus the point to simply 'direct jail recruitment' that's one thing, but at this point it comes across as pumping me for information and links you can delete to keep hackers in the dark and manipulable.
You're warbling back and forth on points in a way designed to draw maximum information out, which is what makes me suspect this.