安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Received personal orders to only approve and support 5 types of song compositions in 1976. I thought a Liutenant Colonel was kind of low rank to be issuing orders like this, so I phreaked some phones and discovered they were a Liutenant Colonel in the British Navy.
Take it or leave it; the CIA has never managed to work out of line with British interests, and in the era of contractors it's only gotten worse.
Must be one of those "benafit" people are gossiping about.
Does this make me bereft? Not at all, for I have not made his acquaintance.
Is this event affecting my life? Not directly - unless this rupture has impeded the development process. Whereupon, I hold the conviction that it is my hope that he finds himself in the care of the government and locked away for a lengthy duration, for his protection and everyone else's.
Yeah there's a little green light inside my skull that turns on when I'm conscious and flicking it on and off gives me a headache.
Why, can you prove you exist?
No it's where the FBI recruits most of their hackers. As well as most other organizations.
Then you don't exist.
Maybe speak out next time.
That detail wasn't left out and, iirc, the apparent lead hacker was also a minor when he hacked R*. Besides, it's not uncommon in Europe that perpetrators that just reached adulthood are still sentenced under juvenile law, especially if they are deemed not mature enough. That's often left to the courts though.
For prosecution, the age when the crime happened is important. Locking him up for "medical reasons" can neatly circumvent due process.
Either way, for hacking without physically harming anyone, life in asylum is a crazy sentence, and that decision was made solely due to his disability. He wouldn't even gotten a nearly as cruel sentence if it weren't for his autism.
See response above.
I think at best the doc will think he's up for release after he was chemically lobotomised, because the drugs they give these inmates to keep them from going nuts in a situation were everyone but absolutely calculating psychopaths would go nuts do just that.
In practice, it's a death sentence. These facilities don't exist for rehabilitation, they only exist for institutionalisation.
Thank you for condensing my points to the shortest form possible. ;P
So we should subject anyone who could potentially harm anyone in any way to a life sentence in a prison asylum, effectively depriving them of all human and civil rights and possibly subjecting them to abuse, (lasting) physical and mental harm and the potential of death in prison?
But it's for "the good of the people", eh?
Sounds like an authoritarian dictatorship to me.
Disabled people are not second-class citizens!
Jeff Moss, who founded the Black Hat and DEF CON computer hacker conferences, has worked as a consultant for different administrations.
He was ICANN Chief Security Officer in the Obama administration. Moss is now a member of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s advisory council.
Mr. Moss ran a bulletin board for hackers in the 1980s.
Barrett Brown - hired by the F.B.I.
A few other notables...
https://www.pcmag.com/news/7-hackers-who-got-legit-jobs-from-their-exploits
In fact, the movies tend to copy real life.