A jewish rabbi (man of God) now owns Pronhub, the most famous pron site in the world.

[DxSpark]

He is a man of God but which God?

Discuss.

"Solomon Friedman is on a mission to save pronhub
The high-profile criminal defence lawyer, firearms advocate and ordained rabbi plans to make the world's largest porn site a force for good."

[Alliesaurus]

Better Call Solomon

[Acetyl]

Postat inițial de :D:

The godly thing for him to do is shut P*rnhub down. Anything short of that is not good.

Depends on what God and what commandments.

[Ramonkey]

Holy ♥♥♥♥

[Boblin the Goblin]

Postat inițial de Birds:

Postat inițial de SlowMango:

The was only one network which has already been removed.

That's simply not true.

Literally is.

[metamec]

Postat inițial de Tonepoet:

Postat inițial de tiny E:

A Jewish rabbi?
As opposed to a Christian rabbi?

Jewish is somewhat unique in that it's both a racial descriptor and a religious descriptor. I suppose you could have a Black rabbi, a German rabbi, a British Rabbi, a Chinese Rabbi, an Indian Rabbi et cetera. It's kinda abnormal since Judaism considers the hebrews to be God's chosen, but it is possible.

Messianic Judaism is technically a protestant (christian) movement which borrows a lot from Judaism (hence the name). It has rabbis. So Christian rabbis are a thing. I guess.

[videomike_Ultimate_Plushie]

I don't know the details but I heard the question "why is there so much incest material on pronhub," was responed to as '"that is an anti-semetic question," but this same owner of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. Really he's just a financial investor buying operating rights to a publicly traded service company so who cares really, it's not even religious. Just figured I'd point out religions are not free of weird ♥♥♥♥ or weird excuses to weird ♥♥♥♥

[Kapitein Gnapmans]

Postat inițial de videomike_Ultimate_Plushie:

I don't know the details but I heard the question "why is there so much incest material on pronhub," was responed to as '"that is an anti-semetic question," but this same owner of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. Really he's just a financial investor buying operating rights to a publicly traded service company so who cares really, it's not even religious. Just figured I'd point out religions are not free of weird ♥♥♥♥ or weird excuses to weird ♥♥♥♥

A question about incest is an antisemitic question? Lmao. That's not suspicious at all. I don't take anyone seriously who likes to throw that word around, it's just one of the many leftist dodging techniques.

[videomike_Ultimate_Plushie]

Postat inițial de lankaras:

Postat inițial de videomike_Ultimate_Plushie:

I don't know the details but I heard the question "why is there so much incest material on pronhub," was responed to as '"that is an anti-semetic question," but this same owner of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. Really he's just a financial investor buying operating rights to a publicly traded service company so who cares really, it's not even religious. Just figured I'd point out religions are not free of weird ♥♥♥♥ or weird excuses to weird ♥♥♥♥

A question about incest is an antisemitic question? Lmao. That's not suspicious at all. I don't take anyone seriously who likes to throw that word around, it's just one of the many leftist dodging techniques.

Hey I'm not the one who said it, it was a higher-up at ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and was apparently quite serious. I to died of laughter hearing it and still am.

[Birds]

Postat inițial de SlowMango:

Postat inițial de Birds:

That's simply not true.

Literally is.

Many people have stated it was more than one network, and indeed many 'personal' videos were filmed non-consensually. Some even performed non-consensually in the first place.

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ has no process nor an interest in doing anything about smaller groups doing this stuff, seemingly.

Instead they focus on the 'one large network' that they 'dealt with,' despite many of the videos they sold to other networks remaining.

[Kapitein Gnapmans]

Postat inițial de videomike_Ultimate_Plushie:

Postat inițial de lankaras:

A question about incest is an antisemitic question? Lmao. That's not suspicious at all. I don't take anyone seriously who likes to throw that word around, it's just one of the many leftist dodging techniques.

Hey I'm not the one who said it, it was a higher-up at ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and was apparently quite serious. I to died of laughter hearing it and still am.

I know, I didn't mean you. Hey, anyone else think there used to be more comments here before?

[Kapitein Gnapmans]

Annnd deleted again. Hmm. There were no insults. I wonder what could be so forbidden about talking about history?

[Pocahawtness]

Why would you single this out?

[☎need4naiim☎]

Even if he hadn't purchased it, that hub belongs to God, in the end. There isn't a single phenomenon in entire Universe which isn't a property of God the Omnipresent.

[videomike_Ultimate_Plushie]

Postat inițial de ☎need4naiim☎:

Even if he hadn't purchased it, that hub belongs to God, in the end. There isn't a single phenomenon in entire Universe which isn't a property of God the Omnipresent.

Wow, he must be a good investment banker to somehow own every company in the world without any legal proof. has he mastered mind control powers or is every capital investor in the world just a golem in the shape of a man?

[☎need4naiim☎]

Postat inițial de videomike_Ultimate_Plushie:

Postat inițial de ☎need4naiim☎:

Even if he hadn't purchased it, that hub belongs to God, in the end. There isn't a single phenomenon in entire Universe which isn't a property of God the Omnipresent.

Wow, he must be a good investment banker to somehow own every company in the world without any legal proof. has he mastered mind control powers or is every capital investor in the world just a golem in the shape of a man?

We are God's property.