安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
They tried that; UK convinced the global economic sphere to ally against them so that they could keep their foothold up their butt.
War is basically their only option, if they want liberty, much like it was for Japan.
Market is something that is not easy to come, try to get on european market with food for example. God speed, as they would never allow you to enter their market.
How? With what materials? With what surplus? With what trade routes?
Would people pay a fair price for their goods? Of course not.
They have a military. They're paying for it. They might as well try to use it first, maybe lower the costs on its maintenance by getting some of it blown up. Same reasoning in Japan; same reason Yamato was relegated to non-duty.
Maybe they can try economic slavery after they try warfare first. Or, rather, maybe they can go back to it afterwards.
Yes, they HAD nothing to fear. But that's history. Russia does not forget and does not forgive (the latter is not entirely true, but requires showing very deep remorse that is not in the books, so can be ignored).
Being a Chewawa nation and sit in the ass of USA only pays off if the latter actually wins and later offer and SERVE actual protection, what is also not in the books. After squeezed and discarded in the trash, people there will have all the ♥♥♥♥ falling back on them. Elections have consequences. It's only overlooked due to long delay.
Woah, Russia is Anonymous?!?!
Maybe if Ukraine had been allowed to join NATO before Russia purposefully shot its own ♥♥♥♥ off stopping them others would have followed suit, and Ukraine wouldn't be facing bakruptcy for its support.
Leave what? The ukis occupy half of kherson and doneck area. And shooting into all kinds of places -- including even Moscow.
First they will liberate their land, and make sure all that scumbaggery stops for now and for the next 20 year. Whaever that takes. And they even have the whatever at disposal and support of the population too. Unlike all the other involved parties that get depleted as we speak, so are on the countdown.
No, Anonymous had previously declared cyber warfare against Russia, due to Putin's invasion. Anonymous had hacked into the online news media and TV channels to 'correct' the Russian Kremlin disinformation campaigns.
They had leaked data from the Central Bank of Russia.
Dumped 10GB of emails, passwords and other personal data.
DDoS attacked certain Russian websites.
Setup a way of communication for Russian to Ukraine citizens to chat online.
At one stage, every single TV channel was hijacked to warn Russians of Putin's lies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiW8PSEoxaU
Anonymous has been puppets since its inception. The founders were strongly influenced by federal agents in their personal chatrooms, and lost control within a year.
So the bank could default.
So like, my local synagogue's personal records? Maybe half of it? 10GB, wow, so much~ /s
Yeah, like Kaspersky's website. Oh no.
Soldiers won't feel so bad shooting Ukranians if they think peace will come afterwards. Helping them talk to eachother in the middle of a war will make them easier to homogenize afterwards.
Yeah like when Big Boss hijacked Venezuela's tv networks to show them throwing blanks at the government from a helicopter:
Anyway they're more likely to be English pretending to be Russian, which Russia wants to push right now because they have a lot of Russians pretending to be Englsh.
Isn't Stalin dead?
Sorry, I mean the French Ironman who was Stalin and is now Putin. After being thrown out of Japan as hard as politically possible. (He was the root cause of the Ruso-Japanese war, owing to mishandling diplomatic communications.)
Anyway yes, due to the rules surrounding the Russian presidency he experienced total heart failure for more than 5 minutes in the 90s (about 46 to be exact) and is thus no longer technically president. His entire rule is illegitemate.
The UK has the tapes proving this shoved so far up their ass that it's hit the earth's butthole and crossed the d/m barrier. (Metaphorically.) It also happned on Trump's property, and nobody's really sure if he has copies or not. Which isn't important, since the UK are the only ones who can verify the legitimacy of the tapes.
It actually makes complete sense if you are Putin.
From just an unbiased point of view, as much as I can manage, Putin's ability to stage forces, to literally annex Crimea without firing a shot, to engage in undeclared guerrilla warfare using Russian units in so-called "separatist regions," was amazing - Nobody did squat. Nobody did a darn thing to effectively halt any of this. How in the heck... That was just crazy. (GG "you know who"... what a loser, though his predecessor's foreign policy wasn't great, either)
Consider all of that. Just think of it for a sec. Here's a klepto-nationalist strongman that literally could do whatever he wanted, and did, looking at this situation where he now has unfettered bullying potential against the most juicy target he could think of. Ukraine isn't Georgia - It's a huge industrial complex, traditional home for a lot of Soviet industry.. just sitting there with nobody sabre-rattling after Crimea gets snatched and wtih thousands of "disguised" Russian soldiers involved in a shooting war for even more of its territory. It's got rich ports, huge fields, the largest nuclear reactor in Europe, and tons and tons of advanced industry, including military production facilities... that all used to be Soviet.
What would you do as a very confident leader who has nobody, nor does he keep anyone, to tell him "no?" What if all the other powers in the world don't appear to care very much about what he does?
Keep in mind - Russia does not like its Military. Why? Because strong military leaders are highly discouraged since they represent a threat to the status quo. The Russian Army is particularly hamstrung and widely denigrated, since they would represent the biggest threat. But, that very same Army also represents the largest portion of government fraud. And, why not? Nobody likes them, the government does not allow competent officers to be promoted, and the only ones that personally succeed appear to be the ones that are the most successful at selling off military "surplus." The Army is in very bad shape from a leadership and support point of view.
The reliability of any readiness data and proficiency reports coming back to the Kremlin should always have been suspect. Evidently, though, Putin et al believed what they were told. And, why shouldn't they? They were sitting in Crimea and the new "break-away" regions, anyway, right? (And, separatist regions in other nearby nations they has successfully managed to create.)
Everything they would have seemed to have been concerned about was covered. At least, according to their own intel. Intel that was terrible, but whatever... Who cares! They've got artillery! (That is all they've ever really cared about, anyway.)
Their plan was a three-day massive assault and a quick victory parade. And, even if "Plan A" was just a test scenario, it's obvious they planned for a very, very, short offensive - Their units did not have sufficient supplies for any kind of protracted engagement. They were sent with weekend rations, if that, and were told it was just an "exercise." They'll be home to catch Saturday Morning Cartoons next week, so what's the problem? /s
Further evidence for Russian expectations is easy to see - The Russian "Kyiv Collumn." You know, that big long column of artillery, armor, comms, support and supply vehicles that just sat on the highway after pushing quickly through the border crossing and ultimately did absolutely nothing?
In my estimation, that was a massive artillery and support column to later link up with airborne units, which would have come from landings in the airport(s) the spetznatz failed to capture/hold, who's purpose was to support the capture/decimation of Kyiv. Which... wasn't ever threatened by the Eastern/Southern forks that were supposed to already have been within striking distance and close enough to Zelensky to read his darn mail.
ALL of that points to one thing - Putin thought he was certain this would be a "short, victorious, war."
That has ever been the biggest mistake any warplanner has ever made, ever.
In that light, with his prior achievements, it's "obvious" that the "smartest" play for him to capture and act to unify Ukraine back into the fold, was a general invasion. And, given what information he may have had, along with assurances by toadies and incompetent military leadership, with false readiness info and inflated supply reports... it was a no-brainer choice. Smaht...
Of course, it was a dumb thing to do, in hindsight. But, that's only in hindsight. The day before the order was given, plans were already being made for the victory celebration. It was the most obvious move possible, given the desired goals and all the reports that Moscow decision makers could have had.
And, no other nations did a darn thing about it... You can be sure some smart persons saw what was coming, but the decision makers did not want to move on it.
If, however, those desired goals had been changed or modified, then Russia would be in a much better position. They could have won over Ukraine with gentle support, trade agreements, and friendly policies. At least they'd have a friendly neighbor. (Aside from quibbling about pipeline issues) But, time waits for no man and Putin was not getting any younger. It was a "now or never" gambit and, IMO, he thought that "now" was the best possible, most prepared, moment. It wasn't.
As a result, Russia's quick day-trip road to Kyiv is bathed in Russian blood and the deaths of untold thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and civilians with no plausible end in sight.
It is the most incompetent offensive in modern military history. (IMO)
Of course, I'm glad for that. But, from an outside point of view, the motivations, the initial results, the potential for even further destruction, is painfully obvious. And, nobody put the brakes on this and nobody stepped up to try to repair this problem before it broke into what may ultimately be a general war who's outcome then becomes pretty darn highly charged with uncertainty.
(Yeah, the ineffectiveness of foreign policy solutions ticked me off. What was going to happen was as obvious as it could have been and other nations just rattled "trade sanctions." Trade Sanctions Do Not Work To Deter Active Aggression
Could someone have blackmailed them into it? Such as with verification of the legtimacy of the tapes, the real ones not the obvious fakes circulated to discredit them.
He's still the King's man; no time to die yet.
No.
This was a planned, albeit badly, hostile armed takeover of another country - A "war." Nobody forced this at all as people who try to force Putin into doing anything tend to get really allergic to open windows in multi-story buildings...
Even as poorly as this offensive turned out to be, it was very obviously planned and intended beforehand. This has been the obvious, IMO, play for a very long time.
Again - All this is just my opinion. I welcome corrections and any points I could have missed.